NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER (Mobile) vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Mobile)
The GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER (Mobile) has 46% better performance than the Quadro RTX 3000 (Mobile) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER (Mobile) and the Quadro RTX 3000 (Mobile) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER (Mobile) GPU
The GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER (Mobile) is a mobile graphics card by NVIDIA. It launched in Q2 2020. Its TU104 chip that powers the GPU uses the Turing architecture and is fabricated on the 12 nm process.
Memory
This GPU is paired with 8 GB of GDDR6 VRAM. Its 1,750 MHz memory clock and 256 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 448 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.
Compatibility
This mobile card has a TDP of 115 W.
Benchmark Performance
The GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER (Mobile) has the 80th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 27.72% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Mobile) GPU
The Quadro RTX 3000 (Mobile) is a mobile graphics card by NVIDIA. It launched in Q2 2019. Its TU106 chip that powers the GPU uses the Turing architecture and is fabricated on the 12 nm process.
Memory
This GPU is paired with 6 GB of GDDR6 VRAM. Its 1,750 MHz memory clock and 192 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 336 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.
Compatibility
This mobile card has a TDP of 80 W.
Benchmark Performance
The Quadro RTX 3000 (Mobile) has the 112th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 18.94% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER (Mobile) | Quadro RTX 3000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q2 2020 | Q2 2019 |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER (Mobile) | Quadro RTX 3000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | 191 FPS | -- |
| Medium - 1080p | 101 FPS | -- |
| High - 1080p | 94 FPS | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | 85 FPS | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | 61 FPS | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | 35 FPS | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) | 38.3 | +8% |
| GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER (Mobile) | 35.3 | |
| GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile | 32 | -9% |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | 30 | -15% |
| GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | 27.7 | -22% |
| GeForce GTX 1080 (Mobile) | 24.6 | -30% |
| GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | 22.1 | -37% |
| GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 19.4 | -45% |
| Radeon RX 5600M | 2.6 | -93% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
The GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER (Mobile) has 46% better performance than the Quadro RTX 3000 (Mobile) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER (Mobile) is ranked 80th with a score of 29,092.5, and the Quadro RTX 3000 (Mobile) is ranked 112th with a score of 19,878.5.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER (Mobile) and the Quadro RTX 3000 (Mobile) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| RTX 3000 Ada Generation (Mobile) | 29,411 | +1% |
| Arc A730M | 29,144 | +0% |
| GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER (Mobile) | 29,092.5 | |
| GeForce GTX 1080 (Mobile) | 28,526.5 | -2% |
| GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | 27,973 | -4% |
| GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 21,261.5 | -27% |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | 20,118.5 | -31% |
| Quadro RTX 3000 (Mobile) | 19,878.5 | -32% |
| GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q | 19,778.5 | -32% |
| GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | 18,688 | -36% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER (Mobile) | Quadro RTX 3000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 8,272 (+48.01%) | 5,589 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 8,315.5 (+40.39%) | 5,923 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 126,287 (+38.18%) | 91,394 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 22,016 (+48.34%) | 14,841.5 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 24,028.5 (+34.51%) | 17,864 |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 142.1 | 204 (+43.56%) |
| PassMark G3D Mark | -- | 11,153 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | -- | 518 |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER (Mobile) | Quadro RTX 3000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | TU104 | TU106 |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Size | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Transistors | 13,600 million | 10,800 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER (Mobile) | Quadro RTX 3000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 Gb/s | 336 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,750 MHz | 1,750 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 256 bit | 192 bit |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 3 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER (Mobile) | Quadro RTX 3000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 W | 80 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER (Mobile) | Quadro RTX 3000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| CUDA Cores | 2,560 | 1,920 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 40 | 30 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 160 | 120 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 64 | 64 |
| Tensor Cores | 320 | 240 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | 30 |
| Core Clock Speed | 1,140 MHz | 945 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,380 MHz | 1,380 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER (Mobile) | Quadro RTX 3000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 88.32 GPixel/s | 88.32 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 220.8 GTexel/s | 165.6 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 7.07 TFLOPS | 5.3 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 220.8 GFLOPS | 165.6 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER (Mobile) | Quadro RTX 3000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 MobileNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
vs
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation (Mobile)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
vs
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
vs
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 MobileNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
vs
Intel Arc A730M
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.