NVIDIA GeForce MX450 vs NVIDIA GeForce 820M

VS
Performance
GeForce MX450551% better
8,2508% of 104,598
GeForce 820M
1,266.51% of 104,598

The GeForce MX450 has 551% better performance than the GeForce 820M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce MX450
No data available
GeForce 820M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce MX450 and the GeForce 820M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce MX450
Shop GeForce 820M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce MX450 GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce MX450 is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q3 2020. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU117S) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.

Memory

The MX450 has 2 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,250 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 80 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The MX450 includes 896 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,395 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,575 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 56 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 31 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The MX450 has the 202nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 7.89% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce 820M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce 820M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q4 2013. It is built on the Fermi 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename GF117B) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The 820M has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 14.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The 820M includes 96 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 625 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 16 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The 820M has the 425th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.21% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce MX450GeForce 820M
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitectureTuringFermi 2.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ3 2020Q4 2013
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for F1 24
F1 24
Display FPS for Horizon Forbidden West
Horizon Forbidden West
Display FPS for Skull & Bones
Skull & Bones
Display FPS for Assassin's Creed Mirage
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Display FPS for EA Sports FC 24
EA Sports FC 24
Display FPS for Counter-Strike 2
Counter-Strike 2
Display FPS for Baldur's Gate 3
Baldur's Gate 3

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for F1 24
F1 24
GeForce MX450GeForce 820M
Low - 1080p
32 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
26 FPS
--
High - 1080p
20 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
13 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce MX450 orGeForce 820M
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce MX45013.4
RTX A500 Mobile11.7-13%
Radeon 680M7.41-45%
Radeon 660M5.6-58%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce MX450 orGeForce 820M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce MX450551% better
8,2508% of 104,598
GeForce 820M
1,266.51% of 104,598

The GeForce MX450 has 551% better performance than the GeForce 820M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce MX450 is ranked 202nd with a score of 8,250, and the GeForce 820M is ranked 425th with a score of 1,266.5.

Performance per dollar
GeForce MX450
No data available
GeForce 820M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce MX450 and the GeForce 820M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce MX450 or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Radeon RX 560 Mobile8,329+1%
Quadro M3000M8,288.5+0%
GeForce MX4508,250
Iris Xe MAX8,214-0%
Radeon RX 560X Mobile8,211.5-0%
Radeon HD 6770M1,328-84%
Radeon HD 8550M1,307-84%
GeForce 820M1,266.5-85%
Quadro 2000M1,261-85%
GeForce GT 640M LE1,259-85%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce MX450 orGeForce 820M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce MX450GeForce 820M
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
1,900
--
3DMark Time Spy Score
2,099
--
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
27,570
(+353.94%)
6,073.5
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
4,725
(+426.76%)
897
3DMark Night Raid Graphics
20,743.5
--
3DMark 11 Performance Score
8,068
(+483.37%)
1,383
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
130
(+265.17%)
35.6
PassMark G3D Mark
3,733
(+654.14%)
495
PassMark G2D Mark
304
(+166.67%)
114
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
57.2
--
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
53.9
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce MX450GeForce 820M
CodenameTU117SGF117B
ArchitectureTuringFermi 2.0
Process Size12 nm28 nm
Transistors4,700 million585 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce MX450GeForce 820M
Memory Size2 GB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR6DDR3
Memory Bandwidth80 Gb/s14.4 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,250 MHz900 MHz
Memory Interface64 bit64 bit
L1 Cache64 KB64 KB
L2 Cache512 KB128 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce MX450GeForce 820M
Bus InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 2.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)31 W15 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce MX450GeForce 820M
CUDA Cores89696
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)142
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)5616
Render Output Units (ROP)328
Core Clock Speed1,395 MHz625 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,575 MHz--

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce MX450GeForce 820M
Pixel Fill Rate50.4 GPixel/s2.5 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate88.2 GTexel/s10 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance2.82 TFLOPS240 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance88.2 GFLOPS20 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce MX450GeForce 820M
DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
OpenCL3.01.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.85.1

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.