NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile

VS
Performance
GeForce MX350
6,1666% of 104,598
RTX A500 Mobile75% better
10,81810% of 104,598

The RTX A500 Mobile has 75% better performance than the GeForce MX350 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce MX350
No data available
RTX A500 Mobile
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce MX350 and the RTX A500 Mobile for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce MX350
Shop RTX A500 Mobile
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce MX350 GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce MX350 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2020. It is built on the Pascal GPU microarchitecture (codename GP107S) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The MX350 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,752 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 56.06 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The MX350 includes 640 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,354 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,468 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 20 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The MX350 has the 227th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 5.89% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile GPU

The NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q1 2022. It is built on the Ampere GPU microarchitecture (codename GA107S) and is manufactured on a 8 nm process.

Memory

The RTX A500 Mobile has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,500 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 96 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The RTX A500 Mobile includes 2,048 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 832 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,537 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 64 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 16 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 60 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The RTX A500 Mobile has the 170th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 10.34% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce MX350RTX A500 Mobile
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitecturePascalAmpere
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2020Q1 2022
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for F1 24
F1 24
Display FPS for Ghost of Tsushima
Ghost of Tsushima
Display FPS for Dragon's Dogma 2
Dragon's Dogma 2
Display FPS for Alone in the Dark (2024)
Alone in the Dark (2024)
Display FPS for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Display FPS for Last Epoch
Last Epoch
Display FPS for Helldivers 2
Helldivers 2

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for F1 24
F1 24
GeForce MX350RTX A500 Mobile
Low - 1080p
--
82 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
72 FPS
High - 1080p
--
33 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
12 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce MX350 orRTX A500 Mobile
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile49.2+321%
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile15.4+32%
GeForce MX45013.4+15%
RTX A500 Mobile11.7
Radeon 680M7.41-37%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce MX350 orRTX A500 Mobile
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce MX350
6,1666% of 104,598
RTX A500 Mobile75% better
10,81810% of 104,598

The RTX A500 Mobile has 75% better performance than the GeForce MX350 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce MX350 is ranked 227th with a score of 6,166, and the RTX A500 Mobile is ranked 170th with a score of 10,818.

Performance per dollar
GeForce MX350
No data available
RTX A500 Mobile
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce MX350 and the RTX A500 Mobile for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce MX350 or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce MX350 orRTX A500 Mobile
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce MX350RTX A500 Mobile
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
1,335.5
2,994.5
(+124.22%)
3DMark Time Spy Score
1,491
3,273
(+119.52%)
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
24,744
48,495.5
(+95.99%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
4,371
7,597.5
(+73.82%)
3DMark Night Raid Graphics
17,916
--
3DMark 11 Performance Score
6,376
11,288.5
(+77.05%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
110
247
(+124.55%)
PassMark G3D Mark
2,805
6,740
(+140.29%)
PassMark G2D Mark
238
434
(+82.35%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce MX350RTX A500 Mobile
CodenameGP107SGA107S
ArchitecturePascalAmpere
Process Size14 nm8 nm
Transistors3,300 million8,700 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce MX350RTX A500 Mobile
Memory Size2 GB4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth56.06 Gb/s96 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,752 MHz1,500 MHz
Memory Interface64 bit64 bit
L1 Cache48 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce MX350RTX A500 Mobile
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)20 W60 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce MX350RTX A500 Mobile
CUDA Cores6402,048
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)516
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)3264
Render Output Units (ROP)1632
Tensor Cores--64
Ray Tracing Cores--16
Core Clock Speed1,354 MHz832 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,468 MHz1,537 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce MX350RTX A500 Mobile
Pixel Fill Rate23.49 GPixel/s49.18 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate46.98 GTexel/s98.37 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance1.88 TFLOPS6.3 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance58.72 GFLOPS98.37 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce MX350RTX A500 Mobile
DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL3.03.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.86.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.