Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
GeForce MX350
6,1666% of 104,598
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q258% better
22,08921% of 104,598
The GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q has 258% better performance than the GeForce MX350 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
GeForce MX350
No data available
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce MX350 and the GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Shop GeForce MX350
Shop GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the NVIDIA GeForce MX350 GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce MX350 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2020. It is built on the Pascal GPU microarchitecture (codename GP107S) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.
Memory
The MX350 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,752 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 56.06 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The MX350 includes 640 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,354 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,468 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 20 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The MX350 has the 227th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 5.89% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q1 2019. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU106) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.
Memory
The RTX 2070 Max-Q has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,500 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 384 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The RTX 2070 Max-Q includes 2,304 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 885 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,185 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 144 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 288 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 36 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 90 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The RTX 2070 Max-Q has the 105th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 21.12% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | GeForce MX350 | GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q1 2020 | Q1 2019 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
Sons of the Forest
Ready or Not
The Finals
Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora
EA Sports WRC
Lords of the Fallen (2023)
Total War: PHARAOH
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Sons of the Forest | GeForce MX350 | GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | 26 FPS | -- |
| Medium - 1080p | 14 FPS | -- |
| High - 1080p | 13 FPS | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce MX350 orGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | 20.8 | +63% |
| Radeon RX 560X Mobile | 20.3 | +59% |
| Radeon 660M | 15.3 | +20% |
| GeForce MX350 | 12.8 | |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce MX350 orGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
GeForce MX350
6,1666% of 104,598
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q258% better
22,08921% of 104,598
The GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q has 258% better performance than the GeForce MX350 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce MX350 is ranked 227th with a score of 6,166, and the GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q is ranked 105th with a score of 22,089.
Performance per dollar
GeForce MX350
No data available
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce MX350 and the GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce MX350 or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q | 23,540 | +282% |
| GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | 22,575.5 | +266% |
| GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 22,089 | +258% |
| GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 21,261.5 | +245% |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | 20,118.5 | +226% |
| Radeon 660M | 6,743 | +9% |
| GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition) | 6,736 | +9% |
| GeForce MX350 | 6,166 | |
| GeForce GTX 775M (Mac Edition) | 6,071 | -2% |
| GeForce GTX 680M | 5,897.5 | -4% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce MX350 orGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | GeForce MX350 | GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 1,335.5 | 6,661 (+398.76%) |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1,491 | 6,571 (+340.71%) |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 24,744 | 106,564 (+330.67%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 4,371 | 17,335 (+296.59%) |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | 17,916 | 71,328 (+298.12%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 6,376 | 18,964 (+197.43%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 110 | 120 (+9.09%) |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 2,805 | 11,685 (+316.58%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 238 | 480 (+101.68%) |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | GeForce MX350 | GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | GP107S | TU106 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Transistors | 3,300 million | 10,800 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | GeForce MX350 | GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 56.06 Gb/s | 384 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,752 MHz | 1,500 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 64 bit | 256 bit |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 4 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | GeForce MX350 | GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 W | 90 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | GeForce MX350 | GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| CUDA Cores | 640 | 2,304 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 5 | 36 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 32 | 144 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 16 | 64 |
| Tensor Cores | -- | 288 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | -- | 36 |
| Core Clock Speed | 1,354 MHz | 885 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,468 MHz | 1,185 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | GeForce MX350 | GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 23.49 GPixel/s | 75.84 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 46.98 GTexel/s | 170.6 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 1.88 TFLOPS | 5.46 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 58.72 GFLOPS | 170.6 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | GeForce MX350 | GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | 6.8 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
AMD Radeon 660M
vs
AMD Radeon RX 560X MobileNVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M (Mac Edition)
vs
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 MobileNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
vs
AMD Radeon RX 560X MobileNVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M (Mac Edition)
vs
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 MobileNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.