PC Part DB: Build Smarter: Compare PC part benchmarks & specsPC PART DB

NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs AMD Radeon R9 M375

NVIDIA
VS
AMD
Performance
GeForce MX35086% better
6,1666% of 104,937
Radeon R9 M375
3,3143% of 104,937

The GeForce MX350 has 86% better performance than the Radeon R9 M375 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce MX350
No data available
Radeon R9 M375
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce MX350 and the Radeon R9 M375 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce MX350
Shop Radeon R9 M375
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce MX350 GPU

The GeForce MX350 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card by NVIDIA. It launched in Q1 2020. Its GP107S chip that powers the GPU uses the Pascal architecture and is fabricated on the 14 nm process.

Memory

This GPU is paired with 2 GB of GDDR5 VRAM. Its 1,752 MHz memory clock and 64 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 56.06 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.

Compatibility

This mobile card has a TDP of 20 W.

Benchmark Performance

The GeForce MX350 has the 224th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 5.88% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon R9 M375 GPU

The Radeon R9 M375 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card by AMD. It launched in Q2 2015. Its Tropo chip that powers the GPU uses the GCN 1.0 architecture and is fabricated on the 28 nm process.

Memory

This GPU is paired with 2 GB of DDR3 VRAM. Its 900 MHz memory clock and 128 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 28.8 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.

Benchmark Performance

The Radeon R9 M375 has the 285th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.16% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce MX350Radeon R9 M375
ManufacturerNVIDIAAMD
ArchitecturePascalGCN 1.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2020Q2 2015
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Display FPS for Ready or Not
Ready or Not
Display FPS for The Finals
The Finals
Display FPS for Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora
Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora
Display FPS for EA Sports WRC
EA Sports WRC
Display FPS for Lords of the Fallen (2023)
Lords of the Fallen (2023)
Display FPS for Total War: PHARAOH
Total War: PHARAOH

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
GeForce MX350Radeon R9 M375
Low - 1080p
26 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
14 FPS
--
High - 1080p
13 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
--
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce MX350 orRadeon R9 M375
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)20.8+63%
Radeon RX 560X (Mobile)20.3+59%
Radeon 660M15.3+20%
GeForce MX35012.8

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce MX350 orRadeon R9 M375
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce MX35086% better
6,1666% of 104,937
Radeon R9 M375
3,3143% of 104,937

The GeForce MX350 has 86% better performance than the Radeon R9 M375 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce MX350 is ranked 224th with a score of 6,166, and the Radeon R9 M375 is ranked 285th with a score of 3,314.

Performance per dollar
GeForce MX350
No data available
Radeon R9 M375
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce MX350 and the Radeon R9 M375 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce MX350 or
GPUBenchmark Performance
GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)6,736+9%
Radeon 660M6,651.5+8%
GeForce MX3506,166
GeForce GTX 775M (Mac Edition)6,071-2%
GeForce GTX 680M5,897.5-4%
GeForce GTX 760M3,369-45%
GeForce MX2303,363.5-45%
Radeon R9 M3753,314-46%
GeForce 945M3,309.5-46%
Radeon R9 M2753,261-47%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce MX350 orRadeon R9 M375
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce MX350Radeon R9 M375
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
1,335.5
--
3DMark Time Spy Score
1,491
--
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
24,744
(+192.27%)
8,466
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
4,371
(+162.21%)
1,667
3DMark Night Raid Graphics
17,916
--
3DMark 11 Performance Score
6,376
(+95.04%)
3,269
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
110
(+141.76%)
45.5
PassMark G3D Mark
2,807
(+186.43%)
980
PassMark G2D Mark
240
(+46.34%)
164
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce MX350Radeon R9 M375
CodenameGP107STropo
ArchitecturePascalGCN 1.0
Process Size14 nm28 nm
Transistors3,300 million1,500 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce MX350Radeon R9 M375
Memory Size2 GB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5DDR3
Memory Bandwidth56.06 Gb/s28.8 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,752 MHz900 MHz
Memory Interface64 bit128 bit
L1 Cache48 KB16 KB
L2 Cache512 KB256 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce MX350Radeon R9 M375
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)20 W--
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce MX350Radeon R9 M375
Stream Processors (SP)--640
CUDA Cores640--
Compute Units (CU)--10
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)5--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)3240
Render Output Units (ROP)1616
Core Clock Speed1,354 MHz1,000 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,468 MHz1,015 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce MX350Radeon R9 M375
Pixel Fill Rate23.49 GPixel/s16.24 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate46.98 GTexel/s40.6 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance1.88 TFLOPS1,299 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance58.72 GFLOPS81.2 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce MX350Radeon R9 M375
DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
OpenCL3.02.1 (1.2)
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.76.5 (5.1)

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.