NVIDIA GeForce MX330 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

VS
Performance
GeForce MX330
4,8345% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q261% better
17,43917% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has 261% better performance than the GeForce MX330 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce MX330
No data available
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce MX330 and the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce MX330
Shop GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce MX330 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2020. It is built on the Pascal GPU microarchitecture (codename GP108B) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The MX330 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,752 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 56.06 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The MX330 includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,531 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,594 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The MX330 has the 253rd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 4.62% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q2 2019. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU116) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.

Memory

The GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,500 MHz memory clock and a 192 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 288 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q includes 1,536 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,140 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,335 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 96 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 48 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 60 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has the 130th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 16.67% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce MX330GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitecturePascalTuring
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2020Q2 2019
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Crysis Remastered
Crysis Remastered
Display FPS for Outriders
Outriders
Display FPS for Hitman 3
Hitman 3
Display FPS for Cyberpunk 2077 (1.0)
Cyberpunk 2077 (1.0)
Display FPS for Immortals Fenyx Rising
Immortals Fenyx Rising
Display FPS for Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
Display FPS for Yakuza: Like a Dragon
Yakuza: Like a Dragon

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Crysis Remastered
Crysis Remastered
GeForce MX330GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Low - 720p
62 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
23 FPS
--
High - 1080p
12 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
9 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce MX330 orGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce MX35011.7+32%
GeForce MX4509.92+12%
GeForce MX3308.86

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce MX330 orGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce MX330
4,8345% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q261% better
17,43917% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has 261% better performance than the GeForce MX330 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce MX330 is ranked 253rd with a score of 4,834, and the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is ranked 130th with a score of 17,439.

Performance per dollar
GeForce MX330
No data available
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce MX330 and the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce MX330 or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce MX330 orGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce MX330GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
1,160
5,084.5
(+338.32%)
3DMark Time Spy Score
1,235.5
5,072
(+310.52%)
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
20,729
63,086
(+204.34%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
3,762
13,355
(+255%)
3DMark Night Raid Graphics
15,787
--
3DMark 11 Performance Score
5,121.5
15,913
(+210.71%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
98.2
(+1.34%)
96.9
PassMark G3D Mark
2,435
8,608
(+253.51%)
PassMark G2D Mark
226
361
(+59.73%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce MX330GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
CodenameGP108BTU116
ArchitecturePascalTuring
Process Size14 nm12 nm
Transistors1,800 million6,600 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce MX330GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Memory Size2 GB6 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth56.06 Gb/s288 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,752 MHz1,500 MHz
Memory Interface64 bit192 bit
L1 Cache48 KB64 KB
L2 Cache512 KB1,536 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce MX330GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)10 W60 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce MX330GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
CUDA Cores3841,536
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)324
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)2496
Render Output Units (ROP)1648
Core Clock Speed1,531 MHz1,140 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,594 MHz1,335 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce MX330GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Pixel Fill Rate25.5 GPixel/s64.08 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate38.26 GTexel/s128.2 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance1,224 GFLOPS4.1 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance38.26 GFLOPS128.2 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce MX330GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
OpenCL3.03.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.86.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.