NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA T1000
The T1000 has 155% better performance than the GeForce MX250 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce MX250 and the T1000 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the NVIDIA GeForce MX250 GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce MX250 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2019. It is built on the Pascal GPU microarchitecture (codename GP108B) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.
Memory
The MX250 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,502 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 48.06 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The MX250 includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 937 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,038 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The MX250 has the 283rd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 567 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.57% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090.
About the NVIDIA T1000 GPU
The NVIDIA T1000 is a workstation graphics card that launched in Q2 2021. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU117) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.
Memory
The T1000 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,250 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 160 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The T1000 includes 896 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,065 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,395 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 56 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The T1000 is a compact, low-profile graphics card that fits into 1 PCIe expansion slot. It supports mini-DisplayPort 1.4a display connections. NVIDIA recommends a power supply of at least 250 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 50 W.
Benchmark Performance
The T1000 has the 184th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 567 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 9.09% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | GeForce MX250 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Workstation |
| Release Date | Q1 2019 | Q2 2021 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
F1 24 | GeForce MX250 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | -- | 98 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 83 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 59 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| RTX A2000 | 104.6 | +78% |
| RTX A2000 (12 GB) | 104.6 | +78% |
| T1000 | 58.8 | |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
The T1000 has 155% better performance than the GeForce MX250 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce MX250 is ranked 283rd with a score of 4,633, and the T1000 is ranked 184th with a score of 11,793.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce MX250 and the T1000 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| RTX A2000 (12 GB) | 19,978 | +331% |
| Quadro P4000 | 15,433 | +233% |
| T1000 | 11,793 | +155% |
| T600 | 8,694 | +88% |
| Quadro P2000 | 8,387 | +81% |
| Radeon R9 M280X | 4,698 | +1% |
| Radeon RX 540 Mobile | 4,646 | +0% |
| GeForce MX250 | 4,633 | |
| Radeon RX 550 Mobile | 4,559 | -2% |
| Radeon Pro 450 | 4,502 | -3% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | GeForce MX250 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 1,103 | 3,088 (+179.96%) |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1,220.5 | 3,534 (+189.55%) |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 21,545 | 50,553 (+134.64%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 3,660 | 8,450 (+130.87%) |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | -- | 41,157 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 4,850 | 12,953 (+167.07%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 99.6 | 335.8 (+237.15%) |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 2,391 | 7,644 (+219.7%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 238 | 877 (+268.49%) |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | 43.6 | -- |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL | 43.7 | -- |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | GeForce MX250 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | GP108B | TU117 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Transistors | 1,800 million | 4,700 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | GeForce MX250 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 48.06 Gb/s | 160 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,502 MHz | 1,250 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 64 bit | 128 bit |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 1,024 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | GeForce MX250 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | -- | 1 slot |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 W | 50 W |
| Suggested PSU | -- | 250 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | GeForce MX250 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| CUDA Cores | 384 | 896 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 3 | 14 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 24 | 56 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 16 | 32 |
| Core Clock Speed | 937 MHz | 1,065 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,038 MHz | 1,395 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | GeForce MX250 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 16.61 GPixel/s | 44.64 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 24.91 GTexel/s | 78.12 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 797.2 GFLOPS | 2.5 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 24.91 GFLOPS | 78.12 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | GeForce MX250 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | 6.8 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.