NVIDIA GeForce MX230 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M

VS
Performance
GeForce MX23095% better
3,363.53% of 104,598
GeForce GT 640M
1,7282% of 104,598

The GeForce MX230 has 95% better performance than the GeForce GT 640M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce MX230
No data available
GeForce GT 640M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce MX230 and the GeForce GT 640M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce MX230
Shop GeForce GT 640M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce MX230 GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce MX230 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2019. It is built on the Pascal GPU microarchitecture (codename GP108) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The MX230 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,502 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 48.06 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The MX230 includes 256 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,519 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,531 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 16 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The MX230 has the 287th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.22% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2012. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK107) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GT 640M has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 28.8 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GT 640M includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 624 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 709 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 32 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GT 640M has the 386th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.65% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce MX230GeForce GT 640M
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitecturePascalKepler
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2019Q1 2012
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Borderlands 3
Borderlands 3
Display FPS for GRID (2019)
GRID (2019)
Display FPS for Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Breakpoint
Ghost Recon Breakpoint
Display FPS for FIFA 20
FIFA 20
Display FPS for Control
Control
Display FPS for F1 2019
F1 2019
Display FPS for Total War: Three Kingdoms
Total War: Three Kingdoms

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Borderlands 3
Borderlands 3
GeForce MX230GeForce GT 640M
Low - 720p
40 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
16 FPS
--
High - 1080p
10 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
7 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce MX230 orGeForce GT 640M
GPUFrames Per Second
Iris Xe MAX11.7+58%
GeForce GTX 950M10.3+39%
GeForce MX25010.2+38%
GeForce MX3308.8+19%
GeForce MX1508.4+14%
GeForce MX2307.4
Radeon 610M6-19%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce MX230 orGeForce GT 640M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce MX23095% better
3,363.53% of 104,598
GeForce GT 640M
1,7282% of 104,598

The GeForce MX230 has 95% better performance than the GeForce GT 640M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce MX230 is ranked 287th with a score of 3,363.5, and the GeForce GT 640M is ranked 386th with a score of 1,728.

Performance per dollar
GeForce MX230
No data available
GeForce GT 640M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce MX230 and the GeForce GT 640M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce MX230 or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Quadro K4000M3,466+3%
GeForce GTX 760M3,369+0%
GeForce MX2303,363.5
Radeon R9 M3753,314-1%
GeForce 945M3,309.5-2%
Radeon R5 M2551,784-47%
GeForce 825M1,756.5-48%
GeForce GT 640M1,728-49%
FirePro M41001,728-49%
GeForce GT 730M1,722-49%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce MX230 orGeForce GT 640M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce MX230GeForce GT 640M
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
748
--
3DMark Time Spy Score
839.5
--
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
15,796.5
(+75.05%)
9,024
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
2,467.5
(+101.43%)
1,225
3DMark 11 Performance Score
3,621.5
(+94.65%)
1,860.5
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
83.4
(+96.7%)
42.4
PassMark G3D Mark
1,835
(+97.95%)
927
PassMark G2D Mark
213
(+8.12%)
197
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce MX230GeForce GT 640M
CodenameGP108GK107
ArchitecturePascalKepler
Process Size14 nm28 nm
Transistors1,800 million1,270 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce MX230GeForce GT 640M
Memory Size2 GB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5DDR3
Memory Bandwidth48.06 Gb/s28.8 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,502 MHz900 MHz
Memory Interface64 bit128 bit
L1 Cache48 KB16 KB
L2 Cache512 KB256 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce MX230GeForce GT 640M
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)10 W32 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce MX230GeForce GT 640M
CUDA Cores256384
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)22
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)1632
Render Output Units (ROP)1616
Core Clock Speed1,519 MHz624 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,531 MHz709 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce MX230GeForce GT 640M
Pixel Fill Rate24.5 GPixel/s5.67 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate24.5 GTexel/s22.69 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance783.9 GFLOPS544.5 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance24.5 GFLOPS22.69 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce MX230GeForce GT 640M
DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
OpenCL3.03.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.86.5 (5.1)

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.