NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)

VS
Performance
GeForce MX150
4,4944% of 104,598
RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)302% better
18,05817% of 104,598

The RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) has 302% better performance than the GeForce MX150 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce MX150
No data available
RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce MX150 and the RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce MX150
Shop RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce MX150 GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce MX150 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2017. It is built on the Pascal GPU microarchitecture (codename GP108) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The MX150 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,502 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 48.06 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The MX150 includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,469 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,532 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 25 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The MX150 has the 262nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 4.30% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) GPU

The RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) is a graphics card by NVIDIA. It is built on the Ampere GPU microarchitecture and is manufactured on a 8 nm process.

Memory

The RTX A2000 Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,750 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 192 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The RTX A2000 Mobile includes 2,560 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 893 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,687 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 80 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 80 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 20 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 95 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The RTX A2000 Mobile has the 120th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 17.26% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce MX150RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitecturePascalAmpere
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2017--
Production StatusEnd-of-life--
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for EA Sports FIFA 23
EA Sports FIFA 23
Display FPS for Cyberpunk 2077 (1.6)
Cyberpunk 2077 (1.6)
Display FPS for EA Sports F1 22
EA Sports F1 22
Display FPS for Tiny Tina's Wonderlands
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands
Display FPS for Ghostwire: Tokyo
Ghostwire: Tokyo
Display FPS for ELEX 2
ELEX 2
Display FPS for Elden Ring
Elden Ring

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for EA Sports FIFA 23
EA Sports FIFA 23
GeForce MX150RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)
Low - 1080p
--
--
Medium - 1080p
15 FPS
--
High - 1080p
9 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
7 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce MX150 orRTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile38.2+474%
GeForce MX1506.66

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce MX150 orRTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce MX150
4,4944% of 104,598
RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)302% better
18,05817% of 104,598

The RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) has 302% better performance than the GeForce MX150 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce MX150 is ranked 262nd with a score of 4,494, and the RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) is ranked 120th with a score of 18,058.

Performance per dollar
GeForce MX150
No data available
RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce MX150 and the RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce MX150 or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce MX150 orRTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce MX150RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
1,046
5,016
(+379.54%)
3DMark Time Spy Score
1,132.5
5,523
(+387.68%)
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
19,132
60,336
(+215.37%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
3,488
13,157
(+277.21%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
4,576
17,348
(+279.11%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
94.1
311
(+230.5%)
PassMark G3D Mark
2,273
10,944
(+381.48%)
PassMark G2D Mark
216
536
(+148.15%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
41.8
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce MX150RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)
CodenameGP108--
ArchitecturePascalAmpere
Process Size14 nm8 nm
Transistors1,800 million--

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce MX150RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)
Memory Size2 GB8 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth48.06 Gb/s192 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,502 MHz1,750 MHz
Memory Interface64 bit128 bit
L1 Cache48 KB--
L2 Cache512 KB--

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce MX150RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4--
Thermal Design Power (TDP)25 W95 W
OutputsDevice Dependent--

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce MX150RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)
CUDA Cores3842,560
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)3--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)2480
Render Output Units (ROP)1632
Tensor Cores--80
Ray Tracing Cores--20
Core Clock Speed1,469 MHz893 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,532 MHz1,687 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce MX150RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)
Pixel Fill Rate24.51 GPixel/s--
Texture Fill Rate36.77 GTexel/s--
FP32 Performance1,177 GFLOPS9.3 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance36.77 GFLOPS--

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce MX150RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)
DirectX12 (12_1)--
OpenCL3.0--
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.86.7

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.