NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

VS
Performance
GeForce MX150
4,4944% of 104,598
Quadro M2000M14% better
5,1435% of 104,598

The Quadro M2000M has 14% better performance than the GeForce MX150 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce MX150
No data available
Quadro M2000M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce MX150 and the Quadro M2000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce MX150
Shop Quadro M2000M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce MX150 GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce MX150 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2017. It is built on the Pascal GPU microarchitecture (codename GP108) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The MX150 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,502 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 48.06 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The MX150 includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,469 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,532 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 25 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The MX150 has the 262nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 4.30% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA Quadro M2000M GPU

The NVIDIA Quadro M2000M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q4 2015. It is built on the Maxwell GPU microarchitecture (codename GM107) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The M2000M has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,253 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 80.19 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The M2000M includes 640 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,098 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,137 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 40 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 55 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The M2000M has the 247th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 4.92% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce MX150Quadro M2000M
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitecturePascalMaxwell
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2017Q4 2015
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for EA Sports FIFA 23
EA Sports FIFA 23
Display FPS for Cyberpunk 2077 (1.6)
Cyberpunk 2077 (1.6)
Display FPS for EA Sports F1 22
EA Sports F1 22
Display FPS for Tiny Tina's Wonderlands
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands
Display FPS for Ghostwire: Tokyo
Ghostwire: Tokyo
Display FPS for ELEX 2
ELEX 2
Display FPS for Elden Ring
Elden Ring

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for EA Sports FIFA 23
EA Sports FIFA 23
GeForce MX150Quadro M2000M
Low - 1080p
--
--
Medium - 1080p
15 FPS
--
High - 1080p
9 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
7 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce MX150 orQuadro M2000M
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile38.2+474%
GeForce MX1506.66

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce MX150 orQuadro M2000M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce MX150
4,4944% of 104,598
Quadro M2000M14% better
5,1435% of 104,598

The Quadro M2000M has 14% better performance than the GeForce MX150 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce MX150 is ranked 262nd with a score of 4,494, and the Quadro M2000M is ranked 247th with a score of 5,143.

Performance per dollar
GeForce MX150
No data available
Quadro M2000M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce MX150 and the Quadro M2000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce MX150 or
GPUBenchmark Performance
GeForce GTX 960M5,278+17%
Radeon Pro 5555,185+15%
Quadro M2000M5,143+14%
Quadro K4100M4,957+10%
GeForce GTX 860M4,902+9%
Radeon RX 550 Mobile4,559+1%
Radeon Pro 4504,502+0%
GeForce MX1504,494
GeForce GTX 850M4,385.5-2%
GeForce GTX 950M4,367-3%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce MX150 orQuadro M2000M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce MX150Quadro M2000M
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
1,046
--
3DMark Time Spy Score
1,132.5
--
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
19,132
29,795
(+55.73%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
3,488
4,157
(+19.18%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
4,576
5,456
(+19.23%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
94.1
(+1.51%)
92.7
PassMark G3D Mark
2,273
3,458
(+52.13%)
PassMark G2D Mark
216
342
(+58.33%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
41.8
52.7
(+26.08%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
--
42.1
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce MX150Quadro M2000M
CodenameGP108GM107
ArchitecturePascalMaxwell
Process Size14 nm28 nm
Transistors1,800 million1,870 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce MX150Quadro M2000M
Memory Size2 GB4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth48.06 Gb/s80.19 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,502 MHz1,253 MHz
Memory Interface64 bit128 bit
L1 Cache48 KB64 KB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce MX150Quadro M2000M
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4MXM-A (3.0)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)25 W55 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce MX150Quadro M2000M
CUDA Cores384640
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)3--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)2440
Render Output Units (ROP)1616
Core Clock Speed1,469 MHz1,098 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,532 MHz1,137 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce MX150Quadro M2000M
Pixel Fill Rate24.51 GPixel/s18.19 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate36.77 GTexel/s45.48 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance1,177 GFLOPS1,455 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance36.77 GFLOPS45.48 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce MX150Quadro M2000M
DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
OpenCL3.03.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.86.7 (5.1)

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.