NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs AMD Radeon Pro 560

VS
Performance
GeForce MX150
4,4944% of 104,598
Radeon Pro 56018% better
5,3055% of 104,598

The Radeon Pro 560 has 18% better performance than the GeForce MX150 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce MX150
No data available
Radeon Pro 560
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce MX150 and the Radeon Pro 560 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce MX150
Shop Radeon Pro 560
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce MX150 GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce MX150 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2017. It is built on the Pascal GPU microarchitecture (codename GP108) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The MX150 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,502 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 48.06 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The MX150 includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,469 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,532 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 25 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The MX150 has the 262nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 4.30% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon Pro 560 GPU

The AMD Radeon Pro 560 is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q2 2017. It is built on the GCN 4.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Polaris 21) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The Pro 560 has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,270 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 81.28 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Pro 560 includes 1,024 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 907 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Pro 560 has the 242nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 5.07% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce MX150Radeon Pro 560
ManufacturerNVIDIAAMD
ArchitecturePascalGCN 4.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2017Q2 2017
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for EA Sports FIFA 23
EA Sports FIFA 23
Display FPS for Cyberpunk 2077 (1.6)
Cyberpunk 2077 (1.6)
Display FPS for EA Sports F1 22
EA Sports F1 22
Display FPS for Tiny Tina's Wonderlands
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands
Display FPS for Ghostwire: Tokyo
Ghostwire: Tokyo
Display FPS for ELEX 2
ELEX 2
Display FPS for Elden Ring
Elden Ring

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for EA Sports FIFA 23
EA Sports FIFA 23
GeForce MX150Radeon Pro 560
Low - 1080p
--
--
Medium - 1080p
15 FPS
--
High - 1080p
9 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
7 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce MX150 orRadeon Pro 560
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile38.2+474%
GeForce MX1506.66

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce MX150 orRadeon Pro 560
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce MX150
4,4944% of 104,598
Radeon Pro 56018% better
5,3055% of 104,598

The Radeon Pro 560 has 18% better performance than the GeForce MX150 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce MX150 is ranked 262nd with a score of 4,494, and the Radeon Pro 560 is ranked 242nd with a score of 5,305.

Performance per dollar
GeForce MX150
No data available
Radeon Pro 560
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce MX150 and the Radeon Pro 560 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce MX150 or
GPUBenchmark Performance
FirePro M61005,369+19%
Quadro M12005,310+18%
Radeon Pro 5605,305+18%
GeForce GTX 960M5,278+17%
Radeon Pro 5555,185+15%
Radeon RX 550 Mobile4,559+1%
Radeon Pro 4504,502+0%
GeForce MX1504,494
GeForce GTX 850M4,385.5-2%
GeForce GTX 950M4,367-3%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce MX150 orRadeon Pro 560
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce MX150Radeon Pro 560
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
1,046
1,376
(+31.55%)
3DMark Time Spy Score
1,132.5
1,519
(+34.13%)
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
19,132
23,105
(+20.77%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
3,488
3,892
(+11.58%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
4,576
5,718
(+24.96%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
94.1
(+8.41%)
86.8
PassMark G3D Mark
2,273
3,475
(+52.88%)
PassMark G2D Mark
216
720
(+233.33%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
41.8
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce MX150Radeon Pro 560
CodenameGP108Polaris 21
ArchitecturePascalGCN 4.0
Process Size14 nm14 nm
Transistors1,800 million3,000 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce MX150Radeon Pro 560
Memory Size2 GB4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth48.06 Gb/s81.28 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,502 MHz1,270 MHz
Memory Interface64 bit128 bit
L1 Cache48 KB16 KB
L2 Cache512 KB1,024 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce MX150Radeon Pro 560
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4PCIe 3.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)25 W75 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce MX150Radeon Pro 560
Stream Processors (SP)--1,024
CUDA Cores384--
Compute Units (CU)--16
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)3--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)2464
Render Output Units (ROP)1616
Core Clock Speed1,469 MHz907 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,532 MHz--

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce MX150Radeon Pro 560
Pixel Fill Rate24.51 GPixel/s14.51 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate36.77 GTexel/s58.05 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance1,177 GFLOPS1.86 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance36.77 GFLOPS116.1 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce MX150Radeon Pro 560
DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
OpenCL3.02.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.86.7

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.