NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

VS
Performance
GeForce GTX 980M211% better
12,51712% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 765M
4,0194% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 980M has 211% better performance than the GeForce GTX 765M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 980M
No data available
GeForce GTX 765M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 980M and the GeForce GTX 765M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce GTX 980M
Shop GeForce GTX 765M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q4 2014. It is built on the Maxwell 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename GM204) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GTX 980M has 8 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,253 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 160.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GTX 980M includes 1,536 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,038 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,127 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 96 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 100 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GTX 980M has the 157th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 11.97% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2013. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK106) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GTX 765M has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,002 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 64.13 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GTX 765M includes 768 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 797 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 863 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GTX 765M has the 274th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.84% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce GTX 980MGeForce GTX 765M
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0Kepler
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ4 2014Q2 2013
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Rage 2
Rage 2
Display FPS for Anno 1800
Anno 1800
Display FPS for Tom Clancy's The Division 2
The Division 2
Display FPS for Dirt Rally 2.0
Dirt Rally 2.0
Display FPS for Anthem
Anthem
Display FPS for Far Cry New Dawn
Far Cry New Dawn
Display FPS for Metro Exodus
Metro Exodus

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Rage 2
Rage 2
GeForce GTX 980MGeForce GTX 765M
Low - 720p
94 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
45 FPS
--
High - 1080p
39 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
38 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
24 FPS
--
4K UHD - 2160p
11 FPS
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 980M orGeForce GTX 765M

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 980M orGeForce GTX 765M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce GTX 980M211% better
12,51712% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 765M
4,0194% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 980M has 211% better performance than the GeForce GTX 765M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce GTX 980M is ranked 157th with a score of 12,517, and the GeForce GTX 765M is ranked 274th with a score of 4,019.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 980M
No data available
GeForce GTX 765M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 980M and the GeForce GTX 765M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 980M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile13,266+6%
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile13,131.5+5%
GeForce GTX 980M12,517
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile12,340-1%
Radeon Pro Vega 2012,289-2%
Quadro P5204,185.5-67%
Radeon 540X4,097-67%
GeForce GTX 765M4,019-68%
GeForce GTX 675MX3,978.5-68%
Quadro M6203,801-70%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 980M orGeForce GTX 765M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce GTX 980MGeForce GTX 765M
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
2,805
--
3DMark Time Spy Score
2,949
--
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
65,241
(+270.35%)
17,616
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
9,682
(+290.56%)
2,479
3DMark 11 Performance Score
11,177
(+173.74%)
4,083
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
101.3
(+14.72%)
88.3
PassMark G3D Mark
7,356
(+268.54%)
1,996
PassMark G2D Mark
498
(+74.74%)
285
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
110.6
(+208.94%)
35.8
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
--
27.3
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce GTX 980MGeForce GTX 765M
CodenameGM204GK106
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0Kepler
Process Size28 nm28 nm
Transistors5,200 million2,540 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce GTX 980MGeForce GTX 765M
Memory Size8 GB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth160.4 Gb/s64.13 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,253 MHz1,002 MHz
Memory Interface256 bit128 bit
L1 Cache48 KB16 KB
L2 Cache2 MB256 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce GTX 980MGeForce GTX 765M
Bus InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM-B (3.0)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)100 W75 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce GTX 980MGeForce GTX 765M
CUDA Cores1,536768
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)--4
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)9664
Render Output Units (ROP)6416
Core Clock Speed1,038 MHz797 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,127 MHz863 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce GTX 980MGeForce GTX 765M
Pixel Fill Rate72.13 GPixel/s13.81 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate108.2 GTexel/s55.23 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance3.46 TFLOPS1,326 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance108.2 GFLOPS55.23 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce GTX 980MGeForce GTX 765M
DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
OpenCL3.03.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.86.5 (5.1)

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.