Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
23,05722% of 104,598
Radeon RX 6600M38% better
31,86830% of 104,598
The Radeon RX 6600M has 38% better performance than the GeForce GTX 980 Ti for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
35.5322% of 161.45
Radeon RX 6600M
No data available
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti has 22% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.
Shop GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Shop Radeon RX 6600M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q2 2015 with a MSRP of $649. It is built on the Maxwell 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename GM200) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The GTX 980 Ti has 6 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,753 MHz memory clock and a 384 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 336.6 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The GTX 980 Ti includes 2,816 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,000 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,076 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 176 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 96 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GTX 980 Ti occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports DVI, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.2 display connections. NVIDIA recommends a power supply of at least 600 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 250 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The GTX 980 Ti has the 101st best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 22.04% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 23,057 score and $649 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 35.53. This is the 74th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
About the AMD Radeon RX 6600M GPU
The AMD Radeon RX 6600M is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q2 2021. It is built on the RDNA 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Navi 23) and is manufactured on a 7 nm process.
Memory
The RX 6600M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,750 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 224 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The RX 6600M includes 1,792 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 2,068 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,416 MHz. It usually operates at 2,177 MHz during typical gaming workloads. Complementing the processing units are 112 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 28 ray accelerators dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 100 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The RX 6600M has the 67th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 30.47% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | AMD |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q2 2015 | Q2 2021 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | $649 | -- |
| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
Sons of the Forest
Alan Wake 2
Lords of the Fallen (2023)
Total War: PHARAOH
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty
Lies of P
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Sons of the Forest | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | -- | 78 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 74 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 71 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | 69 FPS |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | 50 FPS |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | 27 FPS |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 980 Ti orRadeon RX 6600M
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | 43 | +59% |
| Radeon RX 6800M | 39.9 | +48% |
| Radeon RX 7600M XT | 37 | +37% |
| GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile | 35 | +30% |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | 31.9 | +18% |
| Radeon RX 6600M | 27 | |
| Radeon RX 7600M | 26.1 | -3% |
| GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | 24.5 | -9% |
| Arc A730M | 15.4 | -43% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 980 Ti orRadeon RX 6600M
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
23,05722% of 104,598
Radeon RX 6600M38% better
31,86830% of 104,598
The Radeon RX 6600M has 38% better performance than the GeForce GTX 980 Ti for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is ranked 101st with a score of 23,057, and the Radeon RX 6600M is ranked 67th with a score of 31,868.
Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
35.5322% of 161.45
Radeon RX 6600M
No data available
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti has 54% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
GeForce GTX 980 Ti's 35.53 performance per dollar ranks it 74th among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 980 Ti or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 6650M | 32,846 | +42% |
| Radeon RX 6700S | 32,662 | +42% |
| Radeon RX 6600M | 31,868 | +38% |
| GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | 30,465 | +32% |
| RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | 30,262 | +31% |
| GeForce GTX 1070 | 24,652 | +7% |
| Radeon RX 590 | 23,362.5 | +1% |
| GeForce GTX 980 Ti | 23,057 | |
| Radeon RX 6500 XT | 22,954 | -0% |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | 22,891.5 | -1% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 980 Ti orRadeon RX 6600M
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 2080 | 57.62 | +62% |
| Radeon VII | 54.19 | +53% |
| GeForce GTX 1080 | 48.85 | +38% |
| GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 47.21 | +33% |
| Radeon R9 390X | 41.83 | +18% |
| GeForce GTX 980 Ti | 35.53 | |
| GeForce GTX 980 | 32.07 | -10% |
| Radeon R9 FURY | 31.95 | -10% |
| TITAN X (Pascal) | 30.02 | -15% |
| Radeon R9 290X | 29.45 | -17% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 5,058 | 7,840 (+55%) |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 5,026 | 8,094 (+61.04%) |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 98,958 | 144,612 (+46.13%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 16,961 | 23,525 (+38.7%) |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | -- | 97,341 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 18,303 | 25,585 (+39.79%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | -- | 179.6 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 13,809 (+0.35%) | 13,761 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 861 (+20.59%) | 714 |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | GM200 | Navi 23 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Transistors | 8,000 million | 11,060 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336.6 Gb/s | 224 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,753 MHz | 1,750 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 384 bit | 128 bit |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 2 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | 2 slots | -- |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 W | 100 W |
| Suggested PSU | 600 W | -- |
| Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | -- |
| Outputs | DVI, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.2 | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | -- | 1,792 |
| CUDA Cores | 2,816 | -- |
| Compute Units (CU) | -- | 28 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 176 | 112 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 96 | 64 |
| Ray Accelerators | -- | 28 |
| Core Clock Speed | 1,000 MHz | 2,068 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,076 MHz | 2,416 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Game) | -- | 2,177 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 103.3 GPixel/s | 154.6 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 189.4 GTexel/s | 270.6 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 6.06 TFLOPS | 8.66 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 189.4 GFLOPS | 541.2 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | 6.8 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.