NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB)
The RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) has 147% better performance than the GeForce GTX 965M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 965M and the RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2015. It is built on the Maxwell 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename GM204) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The GTX 965M has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,253 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 80.19 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The GTX 965M includes 1,024 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 924 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 950 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 50 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The GTX 965M has the 215th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 6.99% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) GPU
The RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) is a graphics card by NVIDIA. It is built on the Ampere GPU microarchitecture and is manufactured on a 8 nm process.
Memory
The RTX A2000 Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,750 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 192 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The RTX A2000 Mobile includes 2,560 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 893 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,687 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 80 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 80 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 20 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 95 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The RTX A2000 Mobile has the 120th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 17.24% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | GeForce GTX 965M | RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Ampere |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q1 2015 | -- |
| Production Status | End-of-life | -- |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
F1 2020 | GeForce GTX 965M | RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | 97 FPS | -- |
| Medium - 1080p | 46 FPS | -- |
| High - 1080p | 34 FPS | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | 23 FPS | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | 18 FPS | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | 9 FPS | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | 22 | +145% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | 12 | +33% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | 9 | +0% |
| GeForce GTX 965M | 8.99 | |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
The RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) has 147% better performance than the GeForce GTX 965M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce GTX 965M is ranked 215th with a score of 7,322, and the RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) is ranked 120th with a score of 18,058.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 965M and the RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q | 19,778.5 | +170% |
| GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | 18,688 | +155% |
| RTX A2000 Mobile | 18,058 | +147% |
| RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) | 18,058 | +147% |
| GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile | 18,057 | +147% |
| Radeon Pro 560X | 7,590 | +4% |
| Quadro M2200 | 7,372 | +1% |
| GeForce GTX 965M | 7,322 | |
| GeForce GTX 870M | 7,156 | -2% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | 7,153.5 | -2% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | GeForce GTX 965M | RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 1,810 | 5,016 (+177.13%) |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1,952 | 5,523 (+182.94%) |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 34,748 | 60,336 (+73.64%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 5,536 | 13,157 (+137.66%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 7,896 | 17,348 (+119.71%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 93.9 | 311 (+231.2%) |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 3,792 | 10,944 (+188.61%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 332 | 536 (+61.45%) |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | 66.3 | -- |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 965M | RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | GM204 | -- |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Transistors | 5,200 million | -- |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 965M | RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 80.19 Gb/s | 192 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,253 MHz | 1,750 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB | -- |
| L2 Cache | 1,024 KB | -- |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 965M | RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | -- |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 W | 95 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | -- |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 965M | RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) |
|---|---|---|
| CUDA Cores | 1,024 | 2,560 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 64 | 80 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 32 | 32 |
| Tensor Cores | -- | 80 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | -- | 20 |
| Core Clock Speed | 924 MHz | 893 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 950 MHz | 1,687 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 965M | RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 30.4 GPixel/s | -- |
| Texture Fill Rate | 60.8 GTexel/s | -- |
| FP32 Performance | 1.95 TFLOPS | 9.3 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 60.8 GFLOPS | -- |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 965M | RTX A2000 Mobile (8 GB) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | -- |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | -- |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | 6.7 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.