Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
GeForce GTX 965M
7,3227% of 104,598
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER305% better
29,66828% of 104,598
The GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER has 305% better performance than the GeForce GTX 965M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 965M
No data available
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
74.3646% of 161.45
The GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER has 46% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.
Shop GeForce GTX 965M
Shop GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2015. It is built on the Maxwell 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename GM204) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The GTX 965M has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,253 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 80.19 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The GTX 965M includes 1,024 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 924 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 950 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 50 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The GTX 965M has the 215th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 7.00% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER is a desktop graphics card that launched in Q3 2019 with a MSRP of $399. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU106) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.
Memory
The RTX 2060 SUPER has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,750 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 448 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The RTX 2060 SUPER includes 2,176 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,470 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,650 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 136 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 272 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 34 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The RTX 2060 SUPER occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports DVI, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.4a, USB Type-C display connections. NVIDIA recommends a power supply of at least 450 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 175 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The RTX 2060 SUPER has the 75th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 28.36% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 29,668 score and $399 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 74.36. This is the 41st best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | GeForce GTX 965M | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Turing |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |
| Release Date | Q1 2015 | Q3 2019 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | -- | $399 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
Black Myth: Wukong
Once Human
The First Descendant
F1 24
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2
Ghost of Tsushima
Dragon's Dogma 2
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Black Myth: Wukong | GeForce GTX 965M | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | -- | 64 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 48 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 37 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | 19 FPS |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | 14 FPS |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | 7 FPS |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 965M orGeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 13 | +86% |
| GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | 8 | +14% |
| GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | 7 | |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 965M orGeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 30.69 | -46% |
| GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | 57 | |
| GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | 62.38 | +9% |
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
GeForce GTX 965M
7,3227% of 104,598
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER305% better
29,66828% of 104,598
The GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER has 305% better performance than the GeForce GTX 965M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce GTX 965M is ranked 215th with a score of 7,322, and the GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER is ranked 75th with a score of 29,668.
Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 965M
No data available
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
74.3646% of 161.45
The GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER has 114% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER's 74.36 performance per dollar ranks it 0th among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 965M or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 2070 | 31,260 | +327% |
| Radeon RX Vega 64 | 30,823.5 | +321% |
| GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | 29,668 | +305% |
| GeForce GTX 1080 | 29,263 | +300% |
| Radeon RX Vega 56 | 29,086 | +297% |
| Radeon Pro 560X | 7,590 | +4% |
| Quadro M2200 | 7,372 | +1% |
| GeForce GTX 965M | 7,322 | |
| GeForce GTX 870M | 7,156 | -2% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | 7,153.5 | -2% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 965M orGeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 5700 XT | 89.78 | +21% |
| GeForce RTX 3060 | 86.25 | +16% |
| Radeon RX 590 | 83.74 | +13% |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | 82.05 | +10% |
| GeForce RTX 2060 | 77.83 | +5% |
| GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | 74.36 | |
| Radeon RX Vega 56 | 72.9 | -2% |
| GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | 70.07 | -6% |
| GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | 68.93 | -7% |
| GeForce GTX 1070 | 65.04 | -13% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | GeForce GTX 965M | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 1,810 | 8,686 (+379.89%) |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1,952 | 9,049 (+363.58%) |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 34,748 | 121,804 (+250.54%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 5,536 | 22,243 (+301.79%) |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | -- | 96,580 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 7,896 | 25,745 (+226.05%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 93.9 | -- |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 3,794 | 16,538 (+335.9%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 335 | 847 (+152.84%) |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | 66.3 | -- |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 965M | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | GM204 | TU106 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Transistors | 5,200 million | 10,800 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 965M | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 80.19 Gb/s | 448 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,253 MHz | 1,750 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1,024 KB | 4 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 965M | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | -- | 2 slots |
| Bus Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 W | 175 W |
| Suggested PSU | -- | 450 W |
| Power Connectors | -- | 1x 8-pin |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | DVI, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.4a, USB Type-C |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 965M | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| CUDA Cores | 1,024 | 2,176 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | -- | 34 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 64 | 136 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 32 | 64 |
| Tensor Cores | -- | 272 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | -- | 34 |
| Core Clock Speed | 924 MHz | 1,470 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 950 MHz | 1,650 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 965M | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 30.4 GPixel/s | 105.6 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 60.8 GTexel/s | 224.4 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 1.95 TFLOPS | 7.18 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 60.8 GFLOPS | 224.4 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 965M | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | 6.8 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.