NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

VS
Performance
GeForce GTX 870M156% better
7,1567% of 104,598
GeForce GT 755M
2,800.53% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 870M has 156% better performance than the GeForce GT 755M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 870M
No data available
GeForce GT 755M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 870M and the GeForce GT 755M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce GTX 870M
Shop GeForce GT 755M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2014. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK104) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GTX 870M has 3 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,250 MHz memory clock and a 192 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 120 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GTX 870M includes 1,344 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 941 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 967 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 112 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 24 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 100 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GTX 870M has the 216th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 6.84% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2013. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK107) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GT 755M has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,350 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 86.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GT 755M includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 980 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,020 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 50 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GT 755M has the 311th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.68% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce GTX 870MGeForce GT 755M
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitectureKeplerKepler
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2014Q2 2013
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
Display FPS for Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Display FPS for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
The Witcher 3
Display FPS for Grand Theft Auto V
GTA V
Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
GeForce GTX 870MGeForce GT 755M
Low - 720p
51 FPS
--
Medium - 768p
34 FPS
--
High - 1080p
20 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
9 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 870M orGeForce GT 755M

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 870M orGeForce GT 755M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce GTX 870M156% better
7,1567% of 104,598
GeForce GT 755M
2,800.53% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 870M has 156% better performance than the GeForce GT 755M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce GTX 870M is ranked 216th with a score of 7,156, and the GeForce GT 755M is ranked 311th with a score of 2,800.5.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 870M
No data available
GeForce GT 755M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 870M and the GeForce GT 755M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 870M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Quadro M22007,372+3%
GeForce GTX 965M7,322+2%
GeForce GTX 870M7,156
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q7,153.5-0%
Quadro K5100M6,880-4%
Radeon 610M2,863-60%
Radeon HD 6970M2,818.5-61%
GeForce GT 755M2,800.5-61%
GeForce GTX 485M2,709-62%
Radeon HD 7870M2,702-62%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 870M orGeForce GT 755M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce GTX 870MGeForce GT 755M
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
31,322
(+109.28%)
14,966.5
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
4,694
(+122.94%)
2,105.5
3DMark 11 Performance Score
7,120
(+138.33%)
2,987.5
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
93.8
--
PassMark G3D Mark
3,450
(+104.26%)
1,689
PassMark G2D Mark
275
324
(+17.82%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
64.7
(+132.73%)
27.8
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce GTX 870MGeForce GT 755M
CodenameGK104GK107
ArchitectureKeplerKepler
Process Size28 nm28 nm
Transistors3,540 million1,270 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce GTX 870MGeForce GT 755M
Memory Size3 GB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth120 Gb/s86.4 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,250 MHz1,350 MHz
Memory Interface192 bit128 bit
L1 Cache16 KB16 KB
L2 Cache384 KB256 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce GTX 870MGeForce GT 755M
Bus InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)100 W50 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce GTX 870MGeForce GT 755M
CUDA Cores1,344384
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)72
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)11232
Render Output Units (ROP)2416
Core Clock Speed941 MHz980 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)967 MHz1,020 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce GTX 870MGeForce GT 755M
Pixel Fill Rate27.08 GPixel/s8.16 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate108.3 GTexel/s32.64 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance2.6 TFLOPS783.4 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance108.3 GFLOPS32.64 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce GTX 870MGeForce GT 755M
DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
OpenCL3.03.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.5 (5.1)

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.