NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16

VS
Performance
GeForce GTX 860M
4,9025% of 104,598
Radeon Pro Vega 16116% better
10,56910% of 104,598

The Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 116% better performance than the GeForce GTX 860M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 860M
No data available
Radeon Pro Vega 16
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 860M and the Radeon Pro Vega 16 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce GTX 860M
Shop Radeon Pro Vega 16
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2014. It is built on the Maxwell GPU microarchitecture (codename GM107) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GTX 860M has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,253 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 80.19 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GTX 860M includes 640 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,020 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,020 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 40 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GTX 860M has the 250th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 4.69% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 GPU

The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q4 2018. It is built on the GCN 5.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Vega 12) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The Pro Vega 16 has 4 GB of HBM2 memory, with a 1,200 MHz memory clock and a 1,024 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 307.2 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Pro Vega 16 includes 1,024 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 815 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,190 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Pro Vega 16 has the 174th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 10.10% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce GTX 860MRadeon Pro Vega 16
ManufacturerNVIDIAAMD
ArchitectureMaxwellGCN 5.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2014Q4 2018
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for X-Plane 11
X-Plane 11
Display FPS for Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
Display FPS for Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Display FPS for Dota 2 - Reborn
Dota 2 - Reborn
Display FPS for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
The Witcher 3
Display FPS for Grand Theft Auto V
GTA V
Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for X-Plane 11
X-Plane 11
GeForce GTX 860MRadeon Pro Vega 16
Low - 720p
--
65 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
51 FPS
High - 1080p
--
44 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 860M orRadeon Pro Vega 16

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 860M orRadeon Pro Vega 16
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce GTX 860M
4,9025% of 104,598
Radeon Pro Vega 16116% better
10,56910% of 104,598

The Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 116% better performance than the GeForce GTX 860M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce GTX 860M is ranked 250th with a score of 4,902, and the Radeon Pro Vega 16 is ranked 174th with a score of 10,569.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 860M
No data available
Radeon Pro Vega 16
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 860M and the Radeon Pro Vega 16 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 860M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
RTX A500 Mobile10,818+121%
Arc A350M10,730+119%
Radeon Pro Vega 1610,569+116%
T600 Mobile10,498+114%
Radeon 680M10,371+112%
Quadro M2000M5,143+5%
Quadro K4100M4,957+1%
GeForce GTX 860M4,902
Quadro K5000M4,893-0%
GeForce GTX 770M4,889-0%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 860M orRadeon Pro Vega 16
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce GTX 860MRadeon Pro Vega 16
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
2,198
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
2,443
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
27,960.5
56,273
(+101.26%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
3,904
7,745
(+98.39%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
5,134
10,926
(+112.82%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
94
130.2
(+38.51%)
PassMark G3D Mark
3,045
4,809
(+57.93%)
PassMark G2D Mark
227
580
(+155.51%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
49.5
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce GTX 860MRadeon Pro Vega 16
CodenameGM107Vega 12
ArchitectureMaxwellGCN 5.0
Process Size28 nm14 nm
Transistors1,870 million--

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce GTX 860MRadeon Pro Vega 16
Memory Size2 GB4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5HBM2
Memory Bandwidth80.19 Gb/s307.2 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,253 MHz1,200 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit1,024 bit
L1 Cache64 KB16 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1,024 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce GTX 860MRadeon Pro Vega 16
Bus InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)75 W75 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce GTX 860MRadeon Pro Vega 16
Stream Processors (SP)--1,024
CUDA Cores640--
Compute Units (CU)--16
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)4064
Render Output Units (ROP)1632
Core Clock Speed1,020 MHz815 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,020 MHz1,190 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce GTX 860MRadeon Pro Vega 16
Pixel Fill Rate16.32 GPixel/s38.08 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate40.8 GTexel/s76.16 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance1,306 GFLOPS2.44 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance40.8 GFLOPS152.3 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce GTX 860MRadeon Pro Vega 16
DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
OpenCL3.02.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.7 (5.1)6.0

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.