Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
GeForce GTX 780M
7,776.57% of 104,737
TITAN X (Pascal)363% better
35,99534% of 104,737
The TITAN X (Pascal) has 363% better performance than the GeForce GTX 780M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 780M
No data available
TITAN X (Pascal)
30.0219% of 161.45
The TITAN X (Pascal) has 19% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.
Shop GeForce GTX 780M
Shop TITAN X (Pascal)
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2013. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK104) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The GTX 780M has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,250 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 160 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The GTX 780M includes 1,536 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 771 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 797 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 128 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 122 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The GTX 780M has the 210th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 7.42% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the NVIDIA TITAN X (Pascal) GPU
The NVIDIA TITAN X (Pascal) is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q3 2016 with a MSRP of $1,199. It is built on the Pascal GPU microarchitecture (codename GP102) and is manufactured on a 16 nm process.
Memory
The TITAN X has 12 GB of GDDR5X memory, with a 1,251 MHz memory clock and a 384 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 480.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The TITAN X includes 3,584 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,417 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,531 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 224 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 96 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The TITAN X occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a display connections. NVIDIA recommends a power supply of at least 600 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 250 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The TITAN X has the 55th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 34.37% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 35,995 score and $1,199 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 30.02. This is the 79th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | GeForce GTX 780M | TITAN X (Pascal) |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |
| Release Date | Q2 2013 | Q3 2016 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | -- | $1,199 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
The Witcher 3
BioShock Infinite
CS: GO
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
The Witcher 3 | GeForce GTX 780M | TITAN X (Pascal) |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | -- | -- |
| Medium - 768p | -- | -- |
| High - 1080p | 35 FPS | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | 17 FPS | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 780M orTITAN X (Pascal)
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 880M | 18.7 | +8% |
| Iris Xe MAX | 18 | +4% |
| Radeon R9 M390 (Mac Edition) | 17.8 | +3% |
| Radeon HD 8970M | 17.7 | +2% |
| Radeon Pro 460 | 17.4 | +1% |
| GeForce GTX 780M | 17.3 | |
| Radeon RX 460 Mobile | 17.2 | -1% |
| Radeon R9 M295X | 17.1 | -1% |
| GeForce GTX 870M | 15.4 | -11% |
| GeForce GTX 960M | 15 | -13% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 780M orTITAN X (Pascal)
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
GeForce GTX 780M
7,776.57% of 104,737
TITAN X (Pascal)363% better
35,99534% of 104,737
The TITAN X (Pascal) has 363% better performance than the GeForce GTX 780M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce GTX 780M is ranked 210th with a score of 7,776.5, and the TITAN X (Pascal) is ranked 55th with a score of 35,995.
Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 780M
No data available
TITAN X (Pascal)
30.0219% of 161.45
The TITAN X (Pascal) has 46% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
TITAN X (Pascal)'s 30.02 performance per dollar ranks it 0th among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 780M or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | 37,671.5 | +384% |
| Arc A750 | 37,288 | +379% |
| TITAN X (Pascal) | 35,995 | +363% |
| Radeon RX 5700 XT | 35,822.5 | +361% |
| GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | 34,963.5 | +350% |
| T500 Mobile | 7,995.5 | +3% |
| Radeon RX 460 Mobile | 7,792.5 | +0% |
| GeForce GTX 780M | 7,776.5 | |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | 7,678.5 | -1% |
| Radeon Pro 560X | 7,590 | -2% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 780M orTITAN X (Pascal)
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 2080 | 57.62 | +92% |
| Radeon VII | 54.19 | +81% |
| GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | 53.89 | +80% |
| GeForce GTX 1080 | 48.85 | +63% |
| GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 47.21 | +57% |
| TITAN X (Pascal) | 30.02 | |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | GeForce GTX 780M | TITAN X (Pascal) |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | -- | 9,076 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | -- | 9,417 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 35,965 | 135,092 (+275.62%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 5,244 | 27,315.5 (+420.89%) |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | -- | 104,649 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 7,690.5 | 30,628 (+298.26%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 90.5 | 122 (+34.81%) |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 3,854 | -- |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 423 | -- |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | 76 | -- |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 780M | TITAN X (Pascal) |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | GK104 | GP102 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Transistors | 3,540 million | 11,800 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 780M | TITAN X (Pascal) |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 4 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 160 Gb/s | 480.4 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,250 MHz | 1,251 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 256 bit | 384 bit |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 3 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 780M | TITAN X (Pascal) |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | -- | 2 slots |
| Bus Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 W | 250 W |
| Suggested PSU | -- | 600 W |
| Power Connectors | -- | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 780M | TITAN X (Pascal) |
|---|---|---|
| CUDA Cores | 1,536 | 3,584 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 8 | 28 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 128 | 224 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 32 | 96 |
| Core Clock Speed | 771 MHz | 1,417 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 797 MHz | 1,531 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 780M | TITAN X (Pascal) |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 25.5 GPixel/s | 147 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 102 GTexel/s | 342.9 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 2.45 TFLOPS | 10.97 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 102 GFLOPS | 342.9 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 780M | TITAN X (Pascal) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 (5.1) | 6.7 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.