NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M vs AMD Radeon Pro 460

VS
Performance
GeForce GTX 780M15% better
7,776.57% of 104,598
Radeon Pro 460
6,7496% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 780M has 15% better performance than the Radeon Pro 460 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 780M
No data available
Radeon Pro 460
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 780M and the Radeon Pro 460 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce GTX 780M
Shop Radeon Pro 460
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2013. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK104) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GTX 780M has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,250 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 160 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GTX 780M includes 1,536 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 771 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 797 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 128 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 122 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GTX 780M has the 210th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 7.43% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon Pro 460 GPU

The AMD Radeon Pro 460 is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q4 2016. It is built on the GCN 4.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Baffin) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The Pro 460 has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,270 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 81.28 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Pro 460 includes 1,024 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 850 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 907 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 35 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Pro 460 has the 222nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 6.45% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce GTX 780MRadeon Pro 460
ManufacturerNVIDIAAMD
ArchitectureKeplerGCN 4.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2013Q4 2016
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
Display FPS for Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Display FPS for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
The Witcher 3
Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite
Display FPS for Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
CS: GO

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
GeForce GTX 780MRadeon Pro 460
Low - 720p
--
67 FPS
Medium - 768p
--
--
High - 1080p
--
25 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
12 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 780M orRadeon Pro 460

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 780M orRadeon Pro 460
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce GTX 780M15% better
7,776.57% of 104,598
Radeon Pro 460
6,7496% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 780M has 15% better performance than the Radeon Pro 460 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce GTX 780M is ranked 210th with a score of 7,776.5, and the Radeon Pro 460 is ranked 222nd with a score of 6,749.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 780M
No data available
Radeon Pro 460
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 780M and the Radeon Pro 460 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 780M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
T500 Mobile7,995.5+3%
Radeon RX 460 Mobile7,792.5+0%
GeForce GTX 780M7,776.5
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile7,678.5-1%
Radeon Pro 560X7,590-2%
Radeon HD 8970M6,818-12%
Radeon R9 M290X6,817-12%
Radeon Pro 4606,749-13%
Radeon 660M6,743-13%
GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)6,736-13%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 780M orRadeon Pro 460
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce GTX 780MRadeon Pro 460
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
1,374
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
35,965
(+32.89%)
27,064
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
5,244
(+14.4%)
4,584
3DMark 11 Performance Score
7,690.5
(+10.45%)
6,963
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
90.5
114.7
(+26.74%)
PassMark G3D Mark
3,854
(+11.61%)
3,453
PassMark G2D Mark
423
680
(+60.76%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
76
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce GTX 780MRadeon Pro 460
CodenameGK104Baffin
ArchitectureKeplerGCN 4.0
Process Size28 nm14 nm
Transistors3,540 million3,000 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce GTX 780MRadeon Pro 460
Memory Size4 GB4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth160 Gb/s81.28 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,250 MHz1,270 MHz
Memory Interface256 bit128 bit
L1 Cache16 KB16 KB
L2 Cache512 KB1,024 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce GTX 780MRadeon Pro 460
Bus InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)122 W35 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce GTX 780MRadeon Pro 460
Stream Processors (SP)--1,024
CUDA Cores1,536--
Compute Units (CU)--16
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)8--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)12864
Render Output Units (ROP)3216
Core Clock Speed771 MHz850 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)797 MHz907 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce GTX 780MRadeon Pro 460
Pixel Fill Rate25.5 GPixel/s14.51 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate102 GTexel/s58.05 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance2.45 TFLOPS1.86 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance102 GFLOPS116.1 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce GTX 780MRadeon Pro 460
DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
OpenCL3.02.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.7

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.