NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
The GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER has 457% better performance than the GeForce GTX 780 Ti for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER has 290% better value for the money than the GeForce GTX 780 Ti for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q4 2013 with a MSRP of $699. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK110B) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The GTX 780 Ti has 3 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,753 MHz memory clock and a 384 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 336.6 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The GTX 780 Ti includes 2,880 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 875 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 928 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 240 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 48 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GTX 780 Ti occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports DVI, HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 display connections. NVIDIA recommends a power supply of at least 600 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 250 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The GTX 780 Ti has the 141st best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 14.91% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 15,619 score and $699 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 22.34. This is the 83rd best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
About the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is a desktop graphics card that launched in Q1 2024 with a MSRP of $999. It is built on the Ada Lovelace GPU microarchitecture (codename AD103) and is manufactured on a 5 nm process.
Memory
The RTX 4080 SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory, with a 1,438 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 736.3 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The RTX 4080 SUPER includes 10,240 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 2,295 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,550 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 320 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 112 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 320 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 80 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The RTX 4080 SUPER is a large graphics card, occupying 3 PCIe 4.0 x16 expansion slots. It supports HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a display connections. With a thermal design power (TDP) of 320 W and a large, 3-slot size, it is recommended to use a power supply of 700 W and a case with sufficient space to accommodate the card. Compare your card's model and your case's dimensions to verify compatibility.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The RTX 4080 SUPER has the 2nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 83.12% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 87,055 score and $999 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 87.14. This is the 27th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Kepler | Ada Lovelace |
| Market Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release Date | Q4 2013 | Q1 2024 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | $699 | $999 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Sons of the Forest | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | -- | 145 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 141 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 137 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | 135 FPS |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | 132 FPS |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | 103 FPS |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | 103 | |
| Radeon RX 7900 XTX | 103 | +0% |
| GeForce RTX 4080 | 92.3 | -10% |
| Radeon RX 7900 XT | 86 | -17% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | 82.7 | -20% |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | 77.6 | -25% |
| GeForce RTX 3090 | 75 | -27% |
| Radeon RX 7800 XT | 70 | -32% |
| GeForce RTX 3080 | 69.5 | -33% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 4060 | 7.83 | -19% |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (8 GB) | 7.98 | -18% |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 8.85 | -9% |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16 GB) | 9.65 | +-0% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | 9.66 | +-0% |
| GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | 9.7 | |
| Radeon RX 7900 XTX | 9.7 | +0% |
| GeForce RTX 3070 | 9.88 | +2% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | 10.03 | +3% |
| GeForce RTX 3080 | 10.06 | +4% |
Benchmark Performance
The GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER has 457% better performance than the GeForce GTX 780 Ti for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is ranked 141st with a score of 15,619, and the GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is ranked 2nd with a score of 87,055.
The GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER has 290% better value for the money than the GeForce GTX 780 Ti for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is ranked 83rd with a performance per dollar of 22.34, and the GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is ranked 27th with a performance per dollar of 87.14.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 4090 | 104,737 | +571% |
| GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | 87,055 | +457% |
| GeForce RTX 4080 | 86,267 | +452% |
| Radeon RX 7900 XTX | 83,322 | +433% |
| Radeon RX 7900 XT | 75,896 | +386% |
| Radeon R9 290X | 16,167.5 | +4% |
| GeForce GTX 970 | 16,033 | +3% |
| GeForce GTX 780 Ti | 15,619 | |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | 13,645 | -13% |
| Radeon R9 380 | 12,191 | -22% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | 94.63 | +324% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | 93.66 | +319% |
| GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | 87.14 | +290% |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16 GB) | 86.4 | +287% |
| GeForce RTX 3060 | 86.25 | +286% |
| GeForce GTX 660 Ti | 28.14 | +26% |
| Radeon R9 Nano | 26.63 | +19% |
| GeForce GTX 780 Ti | 22.34 | |
| GeForce GTX 680 | 20.47 | -8% |
| Radeon HD 7870 (GHz Edition) | 17.75 | -21% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | -- | 28,378 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | -- | 27,111 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 75,688 | 187,847 (+148.19%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 11,812 | 59,075 (+400.13%) |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | -- | 235,474 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 13,151 | 59,568 (+352.95%) |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 9,525 | 34,209 (+259.15%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 633 | 1,203 (+90.05%) |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | 143.4 | -- |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | GK110B | AD103 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistors | 7,080 million | 45,900 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 3 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336.6 Gb/s | 736.3 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,753 MHz | 1,438 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 384 bit | 256 bit |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1,536 KB | 64 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | 2 slots | 3 slots |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 W | 320 W |
| Suggested PSU | 600 W | 700 W |
| Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 16-pin |
| Outputs | DVI, HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 | HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| CUDA Cores | 2,880 | 10,240 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 15 | 80 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 240 | 320 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 48 | 112 |
| Tensor Cores | -- | 320 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | -- | 80 |
| Core Clock Speed | 875 MHz | 2,295 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 928 MHz | 2,550 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 55.68 GPixel/s | 285.6 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 222.7 GTexel/s | 816 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 5.35 TFLOPS | 52.22 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 222.7 GFLOPS | 816 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 (5.1) | 6.7 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.