Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
GeForce GTX 780 Ti822% better
15,61915% of 104,598
Iris Graphics 6100
1,694.52% of 104,598
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti has 822% better performance than the Iris Graphics 6100 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
22.3414% of 161.45
Iris Graphics 6100
No data available
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti has 14% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.
Shop GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Shop Iris Graphics 6100
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q4 2013 with a MSRP of $699. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK110B) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The GTX 780 Ti has 3 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,753 MHz memory clock and a 384 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 336.6 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The GTX 780 Ti includes 2,880 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 875 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 928 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 240 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 48 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GTX 780 Ti occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports DVI, HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 display connections. NVIDIA recommends a power supply of at least 600 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 250 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The GTX 780 Ti has the 141st best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 14.93% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 15,619 score and $699 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 22.34. This is the 83rd best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
About the Intel Iris Graphics 6100 GPU
The Intel Iris Graphics 6100 is an end-of-life integrated graphics card that released in Q3 2014. It is built on the Generation 8.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Broadwell GT3) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.
Memory
The Iris Graphics 6100 has System Shared of memory. This gives it a memory bandwidth of System Dependent, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Iris Graphics 6100 includes 384 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 300 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,000 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 6 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The Iris Graphics 6100 has the 395th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.62% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | Iris Graphics 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | Intel |
| Architecture | Kepler | Generation 8.0 |
| Market Segment | Desktop | Integrated |
| Release Date | Q4 2013 | Q3 2014 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | $699 | -- |
| Production Status | End-of-life | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
BioShock Infinite
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
BioShock Infinite | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | Iris Graphics 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | 290 FPS | -- |
| Medium - 768p | 238 FPS | -- |
| High - 768p | 219 FPS | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | 116 FPS | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 780 Ti orIris Graphics 6100
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | 151 | +30% |
| Radeon R9 Nano | 132 | +13% |
| Radeon RX 590 | 124.8 | +7% |
| GeForce GTX 780 Ti | 116.4 | |
| GeForce GTX 980 | 116 | +-0% |
| GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB) | 113.5 | -2% |
| GeForce GTX 970 | 113 | -3% |
| Radeon R9 390X | 112.4 | -3% |
| Radeon RX 480 | 110 | -5% |
| Radeon RX 470 | 93.2 | -20% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 780 Ti orIris Graphics 6100
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon R9 390X | 3.82 | -36% |
| Radeon R9 280X | 3.92 | -35% |
| GeForce GTX 980 | 4.73 | -21% |
| GeForce GTX 660 Ti | 4.75 | -21% |
| Radeon R9 Nano | 4.92 | -18% |
| GeForce GTX 780 Ti | 6.01 | |
| GeForce GTX 680 | 8.05 | +34% |
| Radeon HD 7970 | 8.54 | +42% |
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
GeForce GTX 780 Ti822% better
15,61915% of 104,598
Iris Graphics 6100
1,694.52% of 104,598
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti has 822% better performance than the Iris Graphics 6100 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is ranked 141st with a score of 15,619, and the Iris Graphics 6100 is ranked 395th with a score of 1,694.5.
Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
22.3414% of 161.45
Iris Graphics 6100
No data available
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti has 34% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
GeForce GTX 780 Ti's 22.34 performance per dollar ranks it 83rd among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 780 Ti or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon R9 290X | 16,167.5 | +4% |
| GeForce GTX 970 | 16,033 | +3% |
| GeForce GTX 780 Ti | 15,619 | |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | 13,645 | -13% |
| Radeon R9 380 | 12,191 | -22% |
| Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) | 1,720 | -89% |
| Radeon R5 (Carrizo) | 1,711 | -89% |
| Iris Graphics 6100 | 1,694.5 | -89% |
| UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU) | 1,654 | -89% |
| UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU) | 1,589 | -90% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 780 Ti orIris Graphics 6100
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 760 | 31.98 | +43% |
| Radeon R9 FURY | 31.95 | +43% |
| Radeon R9 290X | 29.45 | +32% |
| GeForce GTX 660 Ti | 28.14 | +26% |
| Radeon R9 Nano | 26.63 | +19% |
| GeForce GTX 780 Ti | 22.34 | |
| GeForce GTX 680 | 20.47 | -8% |
| Radeon HD 7870 (GHz Edition) | 17.75 | -21% |
| Radeon HD 7970 | 14.15 | -37% |
| GeForce GTX 590 | 13.11 | -41% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | Iris Graphics 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | -- | 377 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | -- | 425 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 75,688 (+870.61%) | 7,798 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 11,812 (+1,251.49%) | 874 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 13,151 (+643.83%) | 1,768 |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | -- | 36.4 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 9,525 (+943.26%) | 913 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 640 (+101.26%) | 318 |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | 143.4 | -- |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL | -- | 14.6 |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | Iris Graphics 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | GK110B | Broadwell GT3 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Generation 8.0 |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Transistors | 7,080 million | 1.9 billion |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | Iris Graphics 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 3 GB | System Shared |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336.6 Gb/s | System Dependent |
| Memory Clock | 1,753 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory Interface | 384 bit | System Shared |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | -- |
| L2 Cache | 1,536 KB | -- |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | Iris Graphics 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | 2 slots | -- |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | Ring Bus |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 W | 15 W |
| Suggested PSU | 600 W | -- |
| Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | -- |
| Outputs | DVI, HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | Iris Graphics 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Shading Units | -- | 384 |
| CUDA Cores | 2,880 | -- |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 15 | -- |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 240 | 48 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 48 | 6 |
| Core Clock Speed | 875 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 928 MHz | 1,000 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | Iris Graphics 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 55.68 GPixel/s | 6 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 222.7 GTexel/s | 48 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 5.35 TFLOPS | 768 GFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 222.7 GFLOPS | 192 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | Iris Graphics 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 (5.1) | 5.1 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.