NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M (Mac Edition) vs AMD Radeon 680M

VS
Performance
GeForce GTX 775M (Mac Edition)
6,0716% of 104,598
Radeon 680M71% better
10,37110% of 104,598

The Radeon 680M has 71% better performance than the GeForce GTX 775M (Mac Edition) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 775M (Mac Edition)
No data available
Radeon 680M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 775M (Mac Edition) and the Radeon 680M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce GTX 775M (Mac Edition)
Shop Radeon 680M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M (Mac Edition) GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M (Mac Edition) is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q4 2013. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK104) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GTX 775M has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,250 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 160 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GTX 775M includes 1,344 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 797 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 797 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 112 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 100 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GTX 775M has the 228th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 5.80% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon 680M GPU

The AMD Radeon 680M is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q1 2022. It is built on the RDNA 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Rembrandt) and is manufactured on a 6 nm process.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The 680M includes 768 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 2,000 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,200 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 12 ray accelerators dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 50 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The 680M has the 176th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 9.92% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce GTX 775M (Mac Edition)Radeon 680M
ManufacturerNVIDIAAMD
ArchitectureKeplerRDNA 2.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ4 2013Q1 2022
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for F1 24
F1 24
Display FPS for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Display FPS for Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown
Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown
Display FPS for Alan Wake 2
Alan Wake 2
Display FPS for Lords of the Fallen (2023)
Lords of the Fallen (2023)
Display FPS for Total War: PHARAOH
Total War: PHARAOH
Display FPS for Assassin's Creed Mirage
Assassin's Creed Mirage

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for F1 24
F1 24
GeForce GTX 775M (Mac Edition)Radeon 680M
Low - 1080p
--
55 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
46 FPS
High - 1080p
--
34 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
7 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 775M (Mac Edition) orRadeon 680M
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce MX45013.4+81%
RTX A500 Mobile11.7+58%
Radeon 680M7.41
Radeon 660M5.6-24%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 775M (Mac Edition) orRadeon 680M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce GTX 775M (Mac Edition)
6,0716% of 104,598
Radeon 680M71% better
10,37110% of 104,598

The Radeon 680M has 71% better performance than the GeForce GTX 775M (Mac Edition) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce GTX 775M (Mac Edition) is ranked 228th with a score of 6,071, and the Radeon 680M is ranked 176th with a score of 10,371.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 775M (Mac Edition)
No data available
Radeon 680M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 775M (Mac Edition) and the Radeon 680M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 775M (Mac Edition) or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Radeon Pro Vega 1610,569+74%
T600 Mobile10,498+73%
Radeon 680M10,371+71%
Quadro M4000M10,259+69%
GeForce MX55010,005+65%
GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)6,736+11%
GeForce MX3506,166+2%
GeForce GTX 775M (Mac Edition)6,071
GeForce GTX 680M5,897.5-3%
Radeon HD 7970M5,645-7%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 775M (Mac Edition) orRadeon 680M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce GTX 775M (Mac Edition)Radeon 680M
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
2,303
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
2,580
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
--
43,225
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
--
6,865
3DMark 11 Performance Score
6,101
10,326
(+69.25%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
--
144.6
PassMark G3D Mark
3,635
--
PassMark G2D Mark
554
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce GTX 775M (Mac Edition)Radeon 680M
CodenameGK104Rembrandt
ArchitectureKeplerRDNA 2.0
Process Size28 nm6 nm
Transistors3,540 million13,100 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce GTX 775M (Mac Edition)Radeon 680M
Memory Size2 GBSystem Shared
Memory TypeGDDR5System Shared
Memory Bandwidth160 Gb/sSystem Dependent
Memory Clock1,250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory Interface256 bitSystem Shared
L1 Cache16 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce GTX 775M (Mac Edition)Radeon 680M
Bus InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)100 W50 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce GTX 775M (Mac Edition)Radeon 680M
Stream Processors (SP)--768
CUDA Cores1,344--
Compute Units (CU)--12
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)7--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)11248
Render Output Units (ROP)3232
Ray Accelerators--12
Core Clock Speed797 MHz2,000 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)797 MHz2,200 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce GTX 775M (Mac Edition)Radeon 680M
Pixel Fill Rate22.32 GPixel/s70.4 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate89.26 GTexel/s105.6 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance2.14 TFLOPS3.38 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance89.26 GFLOPS211.2 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce GTX 775M (Mac Edition)Radeon 680M
DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL3.02.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.