NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)

VS
Performance
GeForce GTX 765M
4,0194% of 104,598
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)115% better
8,6568% of 104,598

The Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) has 115% better performance than the GeForce GTX 765M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 765M
No data available
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 765M and the Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce GTX 765M
Shop Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2013. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK106) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GTX 765M has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,002 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 64.13 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GTX 765M includes 768 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 797 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 863 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GTX 765M has the 274th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.84% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) GPU

The AMD Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2015. It is built on the GCN 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Amethyst) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R9 M395 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,365 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 174.7 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R9 M395 includes 1,792 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 834 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 112 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 250 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The R9 M395 has the 192nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 8.28% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce GTX 765MRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
ManufacturerNVIDIAAMD
ArchitectureKeplerGCN 3.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2013Q2 2015
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite
Display FPS for Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
CS: GO

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite
GeForce GTX 765MRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
Low - 720p
143 FPS
--
Medium - 768p
95 FPS
--
High - 768p
82 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
27 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 765M orRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 765M orRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce GTX 765M
4,0194% of 104,598
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)115% better
8,6568% of 104,598

The Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) has 115% better performance than the GeForce GTX 765M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce GTX 765M is ranked 274th with a score of 4,019, and the Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) is ranked 192nd with a score of 8,656.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 765M
No data available
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 765M and the Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 765M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Radeon R9 M295X8,850.5+120%
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q8,752+118%
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)8,656+115%
GeForce GTX 880M8,578+113%
Radeon RX 560 Mobile8,329+107%
Quadro P5204,185.5+4%
Radeon 540X4,097+2%
GeForce GTX 765M4,019
GeForce GTX 675MX3,978.5-1%
Quadro M6203,801-5%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 765M orRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce GTX 765MRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
17,616
38,490
(+118.49%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
2,479
6,819
(+175.07%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
4,083
8,305
(+103.4%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
88.3
--
PassMark G3D Mark
1,996
4,911
(+146.04%)
PassMark G2D Mark
285
719
(+152.28%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
35.8
--
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
27.3
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce GTX 765MRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
CodenameGK106Amethyst
ArchitectureKeplerGCN 3.0
Process Size28 nm28 nm
Transistors2,540 million5,000 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce GTX 765MRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
Memory Size2 GB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth64.13 Gb/s174.7 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,002 MHz1,365 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit256 bit
L1 Cache16 KB--
L2 Cache256 KB--

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce GTX 765MRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
Bus InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM-B (3.0)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)75 W250 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce GTX 765MRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
Stream Processors (SP)--1,792
CUDA Cores768--
Compute Units (CU)--28
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)4--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)64112
Render Output Units (ROP)1632
Core Clock Speed797 MHz834 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)863 MHz--

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce GTX 765MRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
Pixel Fill Rate13.81 GPixel/s26.69 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate55.23 GTexel/s93.41 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance1,326 GFLOPS2.99 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance55.23 GFLOPS373.6 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce GTX 765MRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
OpenCL3.02.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.5

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.