Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
GeForce GTX 765M
4,0194% of 104,598
Radeon Pro 56032% better
5,3055% of 104,598
The Radeon Pro 560 has 32% better performance than the GeForce GTX 765M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 765M
No data available
Radeon Pro 560
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 765M and the Radeon Pro 560 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Shop GeForce GTX 765M
Shop Radeon Pro 560
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2013. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK106) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The GTX 765M has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,002 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 64.13 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The GTX 765M includes 768 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 797 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 863 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The GTX 765M has the 274th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.84% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the AMD Radeon Pro 560 GPU
The AMD Radeon Pro 560 is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q2 2017. It is built on the GCN 4.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Polaris 21) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.
Memory
The Pro 560 has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,270 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 81.28 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Pro 560 includes 1,024 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 907 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The Pro 560 has the 242nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 5.07% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | GeForce GTX 765M | Radeon Pro 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | AMD |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q2 2013 | Q2 2017 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
BioShock Infinite
CS: GO
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
BioShock Infinite | GeForce GTX 765M | Radeon Pro 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | 143 FPS | -- |
| Medium - 768p | 95 FPS | -- |
| High - 768p | 82 FPS | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | 27 FPS | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 765M orRadeon Pro 560
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 850M | 30 | +11% |
| GeForce MX230 | 29 | +7% |
| FirePro W5170M | 28.7 | +6% |
| GeForce GTX 675M | 28.6 | +6% |
| GeForce GTX 670MX | 27.9 | +3% |
| GeForce GTX 765M | 27 | |
| Quadro K3100M | 27 | +0% |
| Radeon RX 540 Mobile | 27 | +0% |
| Quadro M600M | 26.9 | +-0% |
| Radeon R9 M280X | 26.5 | -2% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 765M orRadeon Pro 560
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
GeForce GTX 765M
4,0194% of 104,598
Radeon Pro 56032% better
5,3055% of 104,598
The Radeon Pro 560 has 32% better performance than the GeForce GTX 765M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce GTX 765M is ranked 274th with a score of 4,019, and the Radeon Pro 560 is ranked 242nd with a score of 5,305.
Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 765M
No data available
Radeon Pro 560
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 765M and the Radeon Pro 560 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 765M or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| FirePro M6100 | 5,369 | +34% |
| Quadro M1200 | 5,310 | +32% |
| Radeon Pro 560 | 5,305 | +32% |
| GeForce GTX 960M | 5,278 | +31% |
| Radeon Pro 555 | 5,185 | +29% |
| Quadro P520 | 4,185.5 | +4% |
| Radeon 540X | 4,097 | +2% |
| GeForce GTX 765M | 4,019 | |
| GeForce GTX 675MX | 3,978.5 | -1% |
| Quadro M620 | 3,801 | -5% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 765M orRadeon Pro 560
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | GeForce GTX 765M | Radeon Pro 560 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | -- | 1,376 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | -- | 1,519 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 17,616 | 23,105 (+31.16%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 2,479 | 3,892 (+57%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 4,083 | 5,718 (+40.04%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 88.3 (+1.73%) | 86.8 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 1,996 | 3,475 (+74.1%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 285 | 720 (+152.63%) |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | 35.8 | -- |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL | 27.3 | -- |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 765M | Radeon Pro 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | GK106 | Polaris 21 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Transistors | 2,540 million | 3,000 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 765M | Radeon Pro 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 64.13 Gb/s | 81.28 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,002 MHz | 1,270 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | 16 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 1,024 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 765M | Radeon Pro 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 W | 75 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 765M | Radeon Pro 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | -- | 1,024 |
| CUDA Cores | 768 | -- |
| Compute Units (CU) | -- | 16 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 4 | -- |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 64 | 64 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 16 | 16 |
| Core Clock Speed | 797 MHz | 907 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 863 MHz | -- |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 765M | Radeon Pro 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 13.81 GPixel/s | 14.51 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 55.23 GTexel/s | 58.05 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 1,326 GFLOPS | 1.86 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 55.23 GFLOPS | 116.1 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 765M | Radeon Pro 560 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 (5.1) | 6.7 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.