NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
The Quadro M5000M has 252% better performance than the GeForce GTX 760M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 760M and the Quadro M5000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2013. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK106S) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The GTX 760M has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,002 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 64.13 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The GTX 760M includes 768 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 628 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 719 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 55 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The GTX 760M has the 286th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.22% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the NVIDIA Quadro M5000M GPU
The NVIDIA Quadro M5000M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q3 2015. It is built on the Maxwell 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename GM204) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The M5000M has 8 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,253 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 160.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The M5000M includes 1,536 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 962 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,051 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 96 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 100 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The M5000M has the 164th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 11.31% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | GeForce GTX 760M | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q2 2013 | Q3 2015 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
The Witcher 3 | GeForce GTX 760M | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | -- | 155 FPS |
| Medium - 768p | -- | 123 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 67 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | 38 FPS |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 6500M | 39.1 | +3% |
| GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | 39 | +3% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | 39 | +3% |
| Radeon Pro 5500M | 38.8 | +2% |
| Radeon RX 5300M | 38.3 | +1% |
| Quadro M5000M | 38 | |
| Radeon RX 580 Mobile | 37 | -3% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 36 | -5% |
| GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q | 36 | -5% |
| GeForce GTX 980M | 33 | -13% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
The Quadro M5000M has 252% better performance than the GeForce GTX 760M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce GTX 760M is ranked 286th with a score of 3,369, and the Quadro M5000M is ranked 164th with a score of 11,845.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 760M and the Quadro M5000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Quadro P3000 | 12,105 | +259% |
| Arc A370M | 12,089.5 | +259% |
| Quadro M5000M | 11,845 | +252% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | 11,538 | +242% |
| Quadro T2000 Max-Q | 11,461 | +240% |
| Quadro K3100M | 3,581 | +6% |
| Quadro K4000M | 3,466 | +3% |
| GeForce GTX 760M | 3,369 | |
| GeForce MX230 | 3,363.5 | -0% |
| Radeon R9 M375 | 3,314 | -2% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | GeForce GTX 760M | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 15,900 | 63,738 (+300.87%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 2,271 | 9,227.5 (+306.32%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 3,554 | 11,110 (+212.61%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 81.9 | 113.3 (+38.34%) |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 1,720 | 7,016 (+307.91%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 231 | 483 (+109.09%) |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | 32.8 | 112.3 (+242.38%) |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL | -- | 102.8 |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 760M | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | GK106S | GM204 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | 2,540 million | 5,200 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 760M | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 64.13 Gb/s | 160.4 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,002 MHz | 1,253 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 2 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 760M | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 W | 100 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 760M | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| CUDA Cores | 768 | 1,536 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 4 | -- |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 64 | 96 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 16 | 64 |
| Core Clock Speed | 628 MHz | 962 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 719 MHz | 1,051 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 760M | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 11.5 GPixel/s | 67.26 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 46.02 GTexel/s | 100.9 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 1,104 GFLOPS | 3.23 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 46.02 GFLOPS | 100.9 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 760M | Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 (5.1) | 6.8 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.