NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M vs AMD Radeon R5 M335

VS
Performance
GeForce GTX 760M89% better
3,3693% of 104,598
Radeon R5 M335
1,7842% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 760M has 89% better performance than the Radeon R5 M335 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 760M
No data available
Radeon R5 M335
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 760M and the Radeon R5 M335 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce GTX 760M
Shop Radeon R5 M335
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2013. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK106S) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GTX 760M has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,002 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 64.13 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GTX 760M includes 768 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 628 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 719 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 55 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GTX 760M has the 286th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.22% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon R5 M335 GPU

The AMD Radeon R5 M335 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q4 2015. It is built on the GCN 1.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Exo) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R5 M335 has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 14.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R5 M335 includes 320 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,070 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 20 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Benchmark Performance

The R5 M335 has the 380th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.71% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce GTX 760MRadeon R5 M335
ManufacturerNVIDIAAMD
ArchitectureKeplerGCN 1.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2013Q4 2015
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
The Witcher 3
Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite
Display FPS for Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
CS: GO

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
The Witcher 3
GeForce GTX 760MRadeon R5 M335
Low - 720p
--
17 FPS
Medium - 768p
--
11 FPS
High - 1080p
--
6 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
3 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 760M orRadeon R5 M335
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce GT 740M4+38%
GeForce 920M4+38%
Quadro K1100M3.7+28%
Radeon R5 M2553.4+17%
Radeon R7 M2603.2+10%
Radeon R5 M3352.9

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 760M orRadeon R5 M335
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce GTX 760M89% better
3,3693% of 104,598
Radeon R5 M335
1,7842% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 760M has 89% better performance than the Radeon R5 M335 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce GTX 760M is ranked 286th with a score of 3,369, and the Radeon R5 M335 is ranked 380th with a score of 1,784.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 760M
No data available
Radeon R5 M335
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 760M and the Radeon R5 M335 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 760M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Quadro K3100M3,581+6%
Quadro K4000M3,466+3%
GeForce GTX 760M3,369
GeForce MX2303,363.5-0%
Radeon R9 M3753,314-2%
GeForce GTX 560M1,820-46%
Quadro K2000M1,798-47%
Radeon R5 M3351,784-47%
Radeon R5 M2551,784-47%
GeForce 825M1,756.5-48%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 760M orRadeon R5 M335
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce GTX 760MRadeon R5 M335
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
15,900
(+246.41%)
4,590
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
2,271
(+149.29%)
911
3DMark 11 Performance Score
3,554
(+88.14%)
1,889
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
81.9
(+165.05%)
30.9
PassMark G3D Mark
1,720
(+213.3%)
549
PassMark G2D Mark
230
578
(+151.3%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
32.8
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce GTX 760MRadeon R5 M335
CodenameGK106SExo
ArchitectureKeplerGCN 1.0
Process Size28 nm28 nm
Transistors2,540 million690 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce GTX 760MRadeon R5 M335
Memory Size2 GB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5DDR3
Memory Bandwidth64.13 Gb/s14.4 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,002 MHz900 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit64 bit
L1 Cache16 KB16 KB
L2 Cache256 KB128 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce GTX 760MRadeon R5 M335
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)55 W--
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce GTX 760MRadeon R5 M335
Stream Processors (SP)--320
CUDA Cores768--
Compute Units (CU)--5
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)4--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)6420
Render Output Units (ROP)168
Core Clock Speed628 MHz1,070 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)719 MHz--

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce GTX 760MRadeon R5 M335
Pixel Fill Rate11.5 GPixel/s8.24 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate46.02 GTexel/s20.6 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance1,104 GFLOPS659.2 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance46.02 GFLOPS41.2 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce GTX 760MRadeon R5 M335
DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
OpenCL3.02.1 (1.2)
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.5 (5.1)

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.