NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M vs AMD Radeon Pro 560X
The Radeon Pro 560X has 125% better performance than the GeForce GTX 760M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 760M and the Radeon Pro 560X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2013. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK106S) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The GTX 760M has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,002 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 64.13 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The GTX 760M includes 768 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 628 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 719 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 55 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The GTX 760M has the 286th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.22% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the AMD Radeon Pro 560X GPU
The AMD Radeon Pro 560X is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q3 2018. It is built on the GCN 4.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Polaris 21) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.
Memory
The Pro 560X has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,470 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 94.08 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Pro 560X includes 1,024 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,004 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The Pro 560X has the 213th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 7.25% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | AMD |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q2 2013 | Q3 2018 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Doom Eternal | GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | -- | 90 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 46 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 29 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | 26 FPS |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | 19 FPS |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | 128.5 | +591% |
| Radeon RX 6700S | 120.8 | +549% |
| GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q | 96.6 | +419% |
| Arc A730M | 70.9 | +281% |
| Radeon Pro 5500M | 21.9 | +18% |
| Radeon Pro 560X | 18.6 | |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
The Radeon Pro 560X has 125% better performance than the GeForce GTX 760M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce GTX 760M is ranked 286th with a score of 3,369, and the Radeon Pro 560X is ranked 213th with a score of 7,590.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 760M and the Radeon Pro 560X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 780M | 7,776.5 | +131% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | 7,678.5 | +128% |
| Radeon Pro 560X | 7,590 | +125% |
| Quadro M2200 | 7,372 | +119% |
| GeForce GTX 965M | 7,322 | +117% |
| Quadro K3100M | 3,581 | +6% |
| Quadro K4000M | 3,466 | +3% |
| GeForce GTX 760M | 3,369 | |
| GeForce MX230 | 3,363.5 | -0% |
| Radeon R9 M375 | 3,314 | -2% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | -- | 1,614 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | -- | 1,775 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 15,900 | 32,449 (+104.08%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 2,271 | 5,699 (+150.95%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 3,554 | 7,910 (+122.57%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 81.9 | 98.4 (+20.15%) |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 1,720 | 3,678 (+113.84%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 231 | 701 (+203.46%) |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | 32.8 | -- |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | GK106S | Polaris 21 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Transistors | 2,540 million | 3,000 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 64.13 Gb/s | 94.08 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,002 MHz | 1,470 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | 16 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 1,024 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 W | 75 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | -- | 1,024 |
| CUDA Cores | 768 | -- |
| Compute Units (CU) | -- | 16 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 4 | -- |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 64 | 64 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 16 | 16 |
| Core Clock Speed | 628 MHz | 1,004 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 719 MHz | -- |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 11.5 GPixel/s | 16.06 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 46.02 GTexel/s | 64.26 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 1,104 GFLOPS | 2.06 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 46.02 GFLOPS | 128.5 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 (5.1) | 6.7 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.