NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M vs AMD Radeon 530

VS
Performance
GeForce GTX 760M45% better
3,3693% of 104,598
Radeon 530
2,3272% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 760M has 45% better performance than the Radeon 530 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 760M
No data available
Radeon 530
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 760M and the Radeon 530 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce GTX 760M
Shop Radeon 530
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2013. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK106S) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GTX 760M has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,002 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 64.13 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GTX 760M includes 768 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 628 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 719 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 55 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GTX 760M has the 286th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.22% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon 530 GPU

The AMD Radeon 530 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2017. It is built on the GCN 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Weston) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The 530 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 28.8 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The 530 includes 384 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 730 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 891 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 50 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The 530 has the 341st best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.22% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce GTX 760MRadeon 530
ManufacturerNVIDIAAMD
ArchitectureKeplerGCN 3.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2013Q2 2017
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Gears Tactics
Gears Tactics
Display FPS for Doom Eternal
Doom Eternal
Display FPS for Borderlands 3
Borderlands 3
Display FPS for Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Display FPS for Need for Speed Heat
NFS Heat
Display FPS for Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019)
Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019)
Display FPS for GRID (2019)
GRID (2019)

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Gears Tactics
Gears Tactics
GeForce GTX 760MRadeon 530
Low - 720p
--
46 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
17 FPS
High - 1080p
--
11 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 760M orRadeon 530
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce MX15017.8+65%
Radeon 540X16.9+56%
GeForce MX13012+11%
GeForce 930MX11.6+7%
GeForce MX11011.1+3%
Radeon 53010.8

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 760M orRadeon 530
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce GTX 760M45% better
3,3693% of 104,598
Radeon 530
2,3272% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 760M has 45% better performance than the Radeon 530 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce GTX 760M is ranked 286th with a score of 3,369, and the Radeon 530 is ranked 341st with a score of 2,327.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 760M
No data available
Radeon 530
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 760M and the Radeon 530 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 760M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Quadro K3100M3,581+6%
Quadro K4000M3,466+3%
GeForce GTX 760M3,369
GeForce MX2303,363.5-0%
Radeon R9 M3753,314-2%
Radeon HD 8850M2,349-30%
GeForce 840M2,340-31%
Radeon 5302,327-31%
FirePro W4170M2,315-31%
GeForce GT 745M2,249-33%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 760M orRadeon 530
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce GTX 760MRadeon 530
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
443
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
497
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
15,900
(+72.64%)
9,210
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
2,271
(+47.28%)
1,542
3DMark 11 Performance Score
3,554
(+41.71%)
2,508
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
81.9
(+84.04%)
44.5
PassMark G3D Mark
1,720
(+68.63%)
1,020
PassMark G2D Mark
230
(+29.94%)
177
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
32.8
(+92.94%)
17
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
--
14.1
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce GTX 760MRadeon 530
CodenameGK106SWeston
ArchitectureKeplerGCN 3.0
Process Size28 nm28 nm
Transistors2,540 million1,550 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce GTX 760MRadeon 530
Memory Size2 GB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth64.13 Gb/s28.8 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,002 MHz900 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit64 bit
L1 Cache16 KB16 KB
L2 Cache256 KB128 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce GTX 760MRadeon 530
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)55 W50 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce GTX 760MRadeon 530
Stream Processors (SP)--384
CUDA Cores768--
Compute Units (CU)--6
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)4--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)6424
Render Output Units (ROP)168
Core Clock Speed628 MHz730 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)719 MHz891 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce GTX 760MRadeon 530
Pixel Fill Rate11.5 GPixel/s7.13 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate46.02 GTexel/s21.38 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance1,104 GFLOPS684.3 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance46.02 GFLOPS42.77 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce GTX 760MRadeon 530
DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
OpenCL3.02.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.5

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.