Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
GeForce GTX 760
7,9628% of 104,598
TITAN X (Pascal)352% better
35,99534% of 104,598
The TITAN X (Pascal) has 352% better performance than the GeForce GTX 760 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 7607% better
31.9820% of 161.45
TITAN X (Pascal)
30.0219% of 161.45
The GeForce GTX 760 has 7% better value for the money than the TITAN X (Pascal) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Shop GeForce GTX 760
Shop TITAN X (Pascal)
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q2 2013 with a MSRP of $249. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK104) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The GTX 760 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,502 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 192.3 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The GTX 760 includes 1,152 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 980 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,032 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 96 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GTX 760 occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports DVI, HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 display connections. NVIDIA recommends a power supply of at least 450 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 170 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The GTX 760 has the 208th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 7.61% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 7,962 score and $249 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 31.98. This is the 77th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
About the NVIDIA TITAN X (Pascal) GPU
The NVIDIA TITAN X (Pascal) is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q3 2016 with a MSRP of $1,199. It is built on the Pascal GPU microarchitecture (codename GP102) and is manufactured on a 16 nm process.
Memory
The TITAN X has 12 GB of GDDR5X memory, with a 1,251 MHz memory clock and a 384 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 480.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The TITAN X includes 3,584 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,417 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,531 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 224 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 96 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The TITAN X occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a display connections. NVIDIA recommends a power supply of at least 600 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 250 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The TITAN X has the 55th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 34.41% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 35,995 score and $1,199 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 30.02. This is the 79th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | GeForce GTX 760 | TITAN X (Pascal) |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
| Market Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release Date | Q2 2013 | Q3 2016 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | $249 | $1,199 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
BioShock Infinite
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
BioShock Infinite | GeForce GTX 760 | TITAN X (Pascal) |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | 270 FPS | -- |
| Medium - 768p | 187 FPS | -- |
| High - 768p | 165 FPS | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | 65 FPS | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 760 orTITAN X (Pascal)
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 470 | 93.2 | +43% |
| Radeon R9 380 | 80.8 | +24% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | 78 | +19% |
| Radeon R9 280X | 76.3 | +17% |
| GeForce GTX 960 | 75.8 | +16% |
| GeForce GTX 760 | 65.3 | |
| Radeon HD 7970 | 64.3 | -2% |
| GeForce GTX 950 | 63.2 | -3% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 | 63 | -4% |
| GeForce GTX 660 Ti | 62.9 | -4% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 760 orTITAN X (Pascal)
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 960 | 2.63 | -31% |
| GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB) | 2.63 | -31% |
| Radeon R7 370 | 2.66 | -30% |
| GeForce GTX 970 | 2.91 | -24% |
| GeForce GTX 750 Ti | 3.19 | -16% |
| GeForce GTX 760 | 3.81 | |
| Radeon R9 390X | 3.82 | +0% |
| Radeon R9 280X | 3.92 | +3% |
| GeForce GTX 980 | 4.73 | +24% |
| GeForce GTX 660 Ti | 4.75 | +25% |
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
GeForce GTX 760
7,9628% of 104,598
TITAN X (Pascal)352% better
35,99534% of 104,598
The TITAN X (Pascal) has 352% better performance than the GeForce GTX 760 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce GTX 760 is ranked 208th with a score of 7,962, and the TITAN X (Pascal) is ranked 55th with a score of 35,995.
Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 7607% better
31.9820% of 161.45
TITAN X (Pascal)
30.0219% of 161.45
The GeForce GTX 760 has 7% better value for the money than the TITAN X (Pascal) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce GTX 760 is ranked 77th with a performance per dollar of 31.98, and the TITAN X (Pascal) is ranked 79th with a performance per dollar of 30.02.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 760 or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | 37,671.5 | +373% |
| Arc A750 | 37,288 | +368% |
| TITAN X (Pascal) | 35,995 | +352% |
| Radeon RX 5700 XT | 35,822.5 | +350% |
| GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | 34,963.5 | +339% |
| GeForce GTX 660 Ti | 8,415 | +6% |
| GeForce GTX 950 | 8,351 | +5% |
| GeForce GTX 760 | 7,962 | |
| Radeon HD 7970 | 7,770 | -2% |
| Radeon HD 7870 (GHz Edition) | 6,194 | -22% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 760 or
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1080 | 48.85 | +53% |
| GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 47.21 | +48% |
| Radeon R9 280X | 36.09 | +13% |
| GeForce GTX 980 | 32.07 | +0% |
| GeForce GTX 760 | 31.98 | |
| Radeon R9 FURY | 31.95 | -0% |
| TITAN X (Pascal) | 30.02 | -6% |
| Radeon R9 290X | 29.45 | -8% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | GeForce GTX 760 | TITAN X (Pascal) |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | -- | 9,076 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | -- | 9,417 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 40,150 | 135,092 (+236.47%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 5,959 | 27,315.5 (+358.39%) |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | -- | 104,649 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 7,985 | 30,628 (+283.57%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | -- | 122 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 4,794 | -- |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 525 | -- |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | 75.2 | -- |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 760 | TITAN X (Pascal) |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | GK104 | GP102 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Transistors | 3,540 million | 11,800 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 760 | TITAN X (Pascal) |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 2 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192.3 Gb/s | 480.4 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,502 MHz | 1,251 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 256 bit | 384 bit |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 3 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 760 | TITAN X (Pascal) |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | 2 slots | 2 slots |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 W | 250 W |
| Suggested PSU | 450 W | 600 W |
| Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Outputs | DVI, HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 760 | TITAN X (Pascal) |
|---|---|---|
| CUDA Cores | 1,152 | 3,584 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 6 | 28 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 96 | 224 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 32 | 96 |
| Core Clock Speed | 980 MHz | 1,417 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,032 MHz | 1,531 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 760 | TITAN X (Pascal) |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 24.77 GPixel/s | 147 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 99.07 GTexel/s | 342.9 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 2.38 TFLOPS | 10.97 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 99.07 GFLOPS | 342.9 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 760 | TITAN X (Pascal) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 (5.1) | 6.7 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.