NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)

VS
Performance
GeForce GTX 760
7,9628% of 104,737
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)9% better
8,6568% of 104,737

The Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) has 9% better performance than the GeForce GTX 760 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 760
31.9820% of 161.45
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
No data available

The GeForce GTX 760 has 20% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.

Shop GeForce GTX 760
Shop Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q2 2013 with a MSRP of $249. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK104) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GTX 760 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,502 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 192.3 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GTX 760 includes 1,152 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 980 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,032 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 96 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GTX 760 occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports DVI, HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 display connections. NVIDIA recommends a power supply of at least 450 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 170 W.

Benchmark Performance & Value

The GTX 760 has the 208th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 7.60% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 7,962 score and $249 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 31.98. This is the 77th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

About the AMD Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) GPU

The AMD Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2015. It is built on the GCN 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Amethyst) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R9 M395 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,365 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 174.7 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R9 M395 includes 1,792 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 834 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 112 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 250 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The R9 M395 has the 192nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 8.26% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce GTX 760Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
ManufacturerNVIDIAAMD
ArchitectureKeplerGCN 3.0
Market SegmentDesktopMobile
Release DateQ2 2013Q2 2015
Launch Price (MSRP)$249--
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite
GeForce GTX 760Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
Low - 720p
270 FPS
--
Medium - 768p
187 FPS
--
High - 768p
165 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
65 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 760 orRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 760 orRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce GTX 760
7,9628% of 104,737
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)9% better
8,6568% of 104,737

The Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) has 9% better performance than the GeForce GTX 760 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce GTX 760 is ranked 208th with a score of 7,962, and the Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) is ranked 192nd with a score of 8,656.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 760
31.9820% of 161.45
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
No data available

The GeForce GTX 760 has 49% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

GeForce GTX 760's 31.98 performance per dollar ranks it 77th among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 760 or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 760 orRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
GeForce GTX 97048.73+52%
Radeon R9 390X41.83+31%
GeForce GTX 750 Ti36.09+13%
Radeon R9 280X36.09+13%
GeForce GTX 98032.07+0%
GeForce GTX 76031.98
Radeon R9 FURY31.95-0%
Radeon R9 290X29.45-8%
GeForce GTX 660 Ti28.14-12%
Radeon R9 Nano26.63-17%

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce GTX 760Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
40,150
(+4.31%)
38,490
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
5,959
6,819
(+14.43%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
7,985
8,305
(+4.01%)
PassMark G3D Mark
4,793
4,911
(+2.46%)
PassMark G2D Mark
531
720
(+35.59%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
75.2
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce GTX 760Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
CodenameGK104Amethyst
ArchitectureKeplerGCN 3.0
Process Size28 nm28 nm
Transistors3,540 million5,000 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce GTX 760Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
Memory Size2 GB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth192.3 Gb/s174.7 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,502 MHz1,365 MHz
Memory Interface256 bit256 bit
L1 Cache16 KB--
L2 Cache512 KB--

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce GTX 760Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
Slots2 slots--
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)170 W250 W
Suggested PSU450 W--
Power Connectors2x 6-pin--
OutputsDVI, HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2Device Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce GTX 760Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
Stream Processors (SP)--1,792
CUDA Cores1,152--
Compute Units (CU)--28
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)6--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)96112
Render Output Units (ROP)3232
Core Clock Speed980 MHz834 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,032 MHz--

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce GTX 760Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
Pixel Fill Rate24.77 GPixel/s26.69 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate99.07 GTexel/s93.41 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance2.38 TFLOPS2.99 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance99.07 GFLOPS373.6 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce GTX 760Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
OpenCL3.02.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.5

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.