NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

VS
Performance
GeForce GTX 750 Ti5% better
5,3785% of 104,598
Quadro M2000M
5,1435% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti has 5% better performance than the Quadro M2000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
36.0922% of 161.45
Quadro M2000M
No data available

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti has 22% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.

Shop GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Shop Quadro M2000M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q1 2014 with a MSRP of $149. It is built on the Maxwell GPU microarchitecture (codename GM107) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GTX 750 Ti has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,350 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 86.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GTX 750 Ti includes 640 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,020 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,085 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 40 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GTX 750 Ti is a compact, low-profile graphics card that fits into 1 PCIe expansion slot. It supports DVI, mini-HDMI 1.4a display connections. NVIDIA recommends a power supply of at least 250 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 60 W.

Benchmark Performance & Value

The GTX 750 Ti has the 237th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 5.14% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 5,378 score and $149 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 36.09. This is the 72nd best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

About the NVIDIA Quadro M2000M GPU

The NVIDIA Quadro M2000M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q4 2015. It is built on the Maxwell GPU microarchitecture (codename GM107) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The M2000M has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,253 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 80.19 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The M2000M includes 640 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,098 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,137 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 40 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 55 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The M2000M has the 247th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 4.92% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce GTX 750 TiQuadro M2000M
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitectureMaxwellMaxwell
Market SegmentDesktopMobile
Release DateQ1 2014Q4 2015
Launch Price (MSRP)$149--
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Display FPS for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
The Witcher 3
Display FPS for Grand Theft Auto V
GTA V
Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rise of the Tomb Raider
GeForce GTX 750 TiQuadro M2000M
Low - 768p
--
72 FPS
Medium - 768p
--
46 FPS
High - 1080p
--
26 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
22 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD
--
11 FPS
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 750 Ti orQuadro M2000M

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 750 Ti orQuadro M2000M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce GTX 750 Ti5% better
5,3785% of 104,598
Quadro M2000M
5,1435% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti has 5% better performance than the Quadro M2000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is ranked 237th with a score of 5,378, and the Quadro M2000M is ranked 247th with a score of 5,143.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
36.0922% of 161.45
Quadro M2000M
No data available

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti has 55% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti's 36.09 performance per dollar ranks it 72nd among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 750 Ti or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 750 Ti orQuadro M2000M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Radeon R7 37057.17+58%
GeForce GTX 96054.11+50%
GeForce GTX 95052.52+46%
GeForce GTX 97048.73+35%
Radeon R9 390X41.83+16%
GeForce GTX 750 Ti36.09
Radeon R9 280X36.09-0%
GeForce GTX 98032.07-11%
GeForce GTX 76031.98-11%
Radeon R9 FURY31.95-11%

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce GTX 750 TiQuadro M2000M
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
31,349
(+5.22%)
29,795
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
4,294
(+3.3%)
4,157
3DMark 11 Performance Score
5,741
(+5.22%)
5,456
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
--
92.7
PassMark G3D Mark
3,901
(+12.81%)
3,458
PassMark G2D Mark
516
(+50.88%)
342
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
54.3
(+3.04%)
52.7
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
--
42.1
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce GTX 750 TiQuadro M2000M
CodenameGM107GM107
ArchitectureMaxwellMaxwell
Process Size28 nm28 nm
Transistors1,870 million1,870 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce GTX 750 TiQuadro M2000M
Memory Size2 GB4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth86.4 Gb/s80.19 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,350 MHz1,253 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit128 bit
L1 Cache64 KB64 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce GTX 750 TiQuadro M2000M
Slots1 slot--
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)60 W55 W
Suggested PSU250 W--
OutputsDVI, mini-HDMI 1.4aDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce GTX 750 TiQuadro M2000M
CUDA Cores640640
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)4040
Render Output Units (ROP)1616
Core Clock Speed1,020 MHz1,098 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,085 MHz1,137 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce GTX 750 TiQuadro M2000M
Pixel Fill Rate17.36 GPixel/s18.19 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate43.4 GTexel/s45.48 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance1,389 GFLOPS1,455 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance43.4 GFLOPS45.48 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce GTX 750 TiQuadro M2000M
DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
OpenCL3.03.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.7 (5.1)6.7 (5.1)

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.