NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M

VS
Performance
GeForce GTX 750 Ti214% better
5,3785% of 104,598
GeForce GT 735M
1,7132% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti has 214% better performance than the GeForce GT 735M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
36.0922% of 161.45
GeForce GT 735M
No data available

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti has 22% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.

Shop GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Shop GeForce GT 735M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q1 2014 with a MSRP of $149. It is built on the Maxwell GPU microarchitecture (codename GM107) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GTX 750 Ti has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,350 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 86.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GTX 750 Ti includes 640 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,020 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,085 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 40 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GTX 750 Ti is a compact, low-profile graphics card that fits into 1 PCIe expansion slot. It supports DVI, mini-HDMI 1.4a display connections. NVIDIA recommends a power supply of at least 250 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 60 W.

Benchmark Performance & Value

The GTX 750 Ti has the 237th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 5.14% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 5,378 score and $149 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 36.09. This is the 72nd best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

About the NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2013. It is built on the Kepler 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename GK208) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GT 735M has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 14.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GT 735M includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 575 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 628 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 33 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GT 735M has the 392nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.64% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GT 735M
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitectureMaxwellKepler 2.0
Market SegmentDesktopMobile
Release DateQ1 2014Q2 2013
Launch Price (MSRP)$149--
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite
Display FPS for Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
CS: GO

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite
GeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GT 735M
Low - 720p
233 FPS(+264.53%)
64 FPS
Medium - 768p
140 FPS(+311.76%)
34 FPS
High - 768p
122 FPS(+321.38%)
29 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
47 FPS(+464.01%)
8 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 750 Ti or
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce GTX 68062+33%
Radeon R7 37056+20%
GeForce GTX 750 Ti46.7
GeForce GT 103037-21%
GeForce GTX 47032.8-30%
FirePro M41009-81%
GeForce 910M8.6-82%
GeForce GT 735M8.28-82%
Radeon R5 M4308.2-82%
GeForce 820M8.1-83%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 750 Ti orGeForce GT 735M
GPUCost Per Frame
GeForce GTX 9502.52-21%
GeForce GTX 9602.63-18%
GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB)2.63-17%
Radeon R7 3702.66-17%
GeForce GTX 9702.91-9%
GeForce GTX 750 Ti3.19
GeForce GTX 7603.81+20%
Radeon R9 390X3.82+20%
Radeon R9 280X3.92+23%
GeForce GTX 9804.73+48%

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce GTX 750 Ti214% better
5,3785% of 104,598
GeForce GT 735M
1,7132% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti has 214% better performance than the GeForce GT 735M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is ranked 237th with a score of 5,378, and the GeForce GT 735M is ranked 392nd with a score of 1,713.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
36.0922% of 161.45
GeForce GT 735M
No data available

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti has 55% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti's 36.09 performance per dollar ranks it 72nd among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 750 Ti or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Radeon HD 79707,770+44%
Radeon HD 7870 (GHz Edition)6,194+15%
GeForce GTX 750 Ti5,378
GeForce GTX 4805,014-7%
GeForce GT 10304,727.5-12%
GeForce GT 730M1,722-68%
GeForce 920M1,718.5-68%
GeForce GT 735M1,713-68%
Radeon HD 8750M1,698-68%
Radeon R5 M3301,689-69%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 750 Ti orGeForce GT 735M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Radeon R7 37057.17+58%
GeForce GTX 96054.11+50%
GeForce GTX 95052.52+46%
GeForce GTX 97048.73+35%
Radeon R9 390X41.83+16%
GeForce GTX 750 Ti36.09
Radeon R9 280X36.09-0%
GeForce GTX 98032.07-11%
GeForce GTX 76031.98-11%
Radeon R9 FURY31.95-11%

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GT 735M
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
31,349
(+363.95%)
6,757
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
4,294
(+319.54%)
1,023.5
3DMark 11 Performance Score
5,741
(+220.55%)
1,791
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
--
49.2
PassMark G3D Mark
3,901
(+502.01%)
648
PassMark G2D Mark
516
(+303.13%)
128
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
54.3
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GT 735M
CodenameGM107GK208
ArchitectureMaxwellKepler 2.0
Process Size28 nm28 nm
Transistors1,870 million1,020 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GT 735M
Memory Size2 GB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5DDR3
Memory Bandwidth86.4 Gb/s14.4 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,350 MHz900 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit64 bit
L1 Cache64 KB16 KB
L2 Cache2 MB512 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GT 735M
Slots1 slot--
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)60 W33 W
Suggested PSU250 W--
OutputsDVI, mini-HDMI 1.4aDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GT 735M
CUDA Cores640384
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)--2
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)4032
Render Output Units (ROP)168
Core Clock Speed1,020 MHz575 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,085 MHz628 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GT 735M
Pixel Fill Rate17.36 GPixel/s5.02 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate43.4 GTexel/s20.1 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance1,389 GFLOPS482.3 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance43.4 GFLOPS20.1 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GT 735M
DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
OpenCL3.03.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.7 (5.1)6.5 (5.1)

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.