NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs AMD Radeon R5 M255

VS
Performance
GeForce GTX 750 Ti201% better
5,3785% of 104,737
Radeon R5 M255
1,7842% of 104,737

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti has 201% better performance than the Radeon R5 M255 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
36.0922% of 161.45
Radeon R5 M255
No data available

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti has 22% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.

Shop GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Shop Radeon R5 M255
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q1 2014 with a MSRP of $149. It is built on the Maxwell GPU microarchitecture (codename GM107) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GTX 750 Ti has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,350 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 86.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GTX 750 Ti includes 640 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,020 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,085 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 40 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GTX 750 Ti is a compact, low-profile graphics card that fits into 1 PCIe expansion slot. It supports DVI, mini-HDMI 1.4a display connections. NVIDIA recommends a power supply of at least 250 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 60 W.

Benchmark Performance & Value

The GTX 750 Ti has the 237th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 5.13% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 5,378 score and $149 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 36.09. This is the 72nd best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

About the AMD Radeon R5 M255 GPU

The AMD Radeon R5 M255 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q4 2014. It is built on the GCN 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Topaz) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R5 M255 has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 1,000 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 32 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R5 M255 includes 384 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 925 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 940 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Benchmark Performance

The R5 M255 has the 380th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.70% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce GTX 750 TiRadeon R5 M255
ManufacturerNVIDIAAMD
ArchitectureMaxwellGCN 3.0
Market SegmentDesktopMobile
Release DateQ1 2014Q4 2014
Launch Price (MSRP)$149--
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Display FPS for Ready or Not
Ready or Not
Display FPS for EA Sports WRC
EA Sports WRC
Display FPS for Total War: PHARAOH
Total War: PHARAOH
Display FPS for Counter-Strike 2
Counter-Strike 2
Display FPS for Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty
Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty
Display FPS for Lies of P
Lies of P

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
GeForce GTX 750 TiRadeon R5 M255
Low - 1080p
--
7 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
--
High - 1080p
--
--
Ultra - 1080p
--
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 750 Ti orRadeon R5 M255
GPUFrames Per Second
Our database does not have enough FPS data to compare with other GPUs.

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 750 Ti orRadeon R5 M255
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce GTX 750 Ti201% better
5,3785% of 104,737
Radeon R5 M255
1,7842% of 104,737

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti has 201% better performance than the Radeon R5 M255 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is ranked 237th with a score of 5,378, and the Radeon R5 M255 is ranked 380th with a score of 1,784.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
36.0922% of 161.45
Radeon R5 M255
No data available

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti has 55% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti's 36.09 performance per dollar ranks it 72nd among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 750 Ti or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Radeon HD 79707,770+44%
Radeon HD 7870 (GHz Edition)6,194+15%
GeForce GTX 750 Ti5,378
GeForce GTX 4805,014-7%
GeForce GT 10304,727.5-12%
GeForce GTX 560M1,820-66%
Quadro K2000M1,798-67%
Radeon R5 M3351,784-67%
Radeon R5 M2551,784-67%
GeForce 825M1,756.5-67%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 750 Ti orRadeon R5 M255
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Radeon R7 37057.17+58%
GeForce GTX 96054.11+50%
GeForce GTX 95052.52+46%
GeForce GTX 97048.73+35%
Radeon R9 390X41.83+16%
GeForce GTX 750 Ti36.09
Radeon R9 280X36.09-0%
GeForce GTX 98032.07-11%
GeForce GTX 76031.98-11%
Radeon R9 FURY31.95-11%

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce GTX 750 TiRadeon R5 M255
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
31,349
(+417.91%)
6,053
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
4,294
(+297.41%)
1,080.5
3DMark 11 Performance Score
5,741
(+201.05%)
1,907
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
--
34.7
PassMark G3D Mark
3,904
(+631.09%)
534
PassMark G2D Mark
511
(+275.74%)
136
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
54.3
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce GTX 750 TiRadeon R5 M255
CodenameGM107Topaz
ArchitectureMaxwellGCN 3.0
Process Size28 nm28 nm
Transistors1,870 million1,550 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce GTX 750 TiRadeon R5 M255
Memory Size2 GB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5DDR3
Memory Bandwidth86.4 Gb/s32 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,350 MHz1,000 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit128 bit
L1 Cache64 KB16 KB
L2 Cache2 MB256 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce GTX 750 TiRadeon R5 M255
Slots1 slot--
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)60 W--
Suggested PSU250 W--
OutputsDVI, mini-HDMI 1.4aDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce GTX 750 TiRadeon R5 M255
Stream Processors (SP)--384
CUDA Cores640--
Compute Units (CU)--6
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)4024
Render Output Units (ROP)168
Core Clock Speed1,020 MHz925 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,085 MHz940 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce GTX 750 TiRadeon R5 M255
Pixel Fill Rate17.36 GPixel/s7.52 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate43.4 GTexel/s22.56 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance1,389 GFLOPS721.9 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance43.4 GFLOPS45.12 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce GTX 750 TiRadeon R5 M255
DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
OpenCL3.02.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.7 (5.1)6.5

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.