NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition) vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)

VS
Performance
GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)
6,7366% of 104,598
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)29% better
8,6568% of 104,598

The Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) has 29% better performance than the GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)
No data available
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition) and the Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)
Shop Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition) GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition) is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q4 2012. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK104) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GTX 680MX has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,250 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 160 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GTX 680MX includes 1,536 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 719 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 719 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 128 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 122 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GTX 680MX has the 224th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 6.44% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) GPU

The AMD Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2015. It is built on the GCN 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Amethyst) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R9 M395 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,365 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 174.7 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R9 M395 includes 1,792 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 834 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 112 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 250 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The R9 M395 has the 192nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 8.28% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
ManufacturerNVIDIAAMD
ArchitectureKeplerGCN 3.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ4 2012Q2 2015
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
The Witcher 3

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
The Witcher 3
GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
Low - 720p
72 FPS
--
Medium - 768p
44 FPS
--
High - 1080p
26 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
14 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition) orRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition) orRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)
6,7366% of 104,598
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)29% better
8,6568% of 104,598

The Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) has 29% better performance than the GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition) is ranked 224th with a score of 6,736, and the Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) is ranked 192nd with a score of 8,656.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)
No data available
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition) and the Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition) or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition) orRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
--
38,490
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
--
6,819
3DMark 11 Performance Score
6,883
8,305
(+20.66%)
PassMark G3D Mark
4,138
4,911
(+18.68%)
PassMark G2D Mark
539
719
(+33.4%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
CodenameGK104Amethyst
ArchitectureKeplerGCN 3.0
Process Size28 nm28 nm
Transistors3,540 million5,000 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
Memory Size2 GB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth160 Gb/s174.7 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,250 MHz1,365 MHz
Memory Interface256 bit256 bit
L1 Cache16 KB--
L2 Cache512 KB--

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)122 W250 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
Stream Processors (SP)--1,792
CUDA Cores1,536--
Compute Units (CU)--28
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)8--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)128112
Render Output Units (ROP)3232
Core Clock Speed719 MHz834 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)719 MHz--

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
Pixel Fill Rate23.01 GPixel/s26.69 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate92.03 GTexel/s93.41 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance2.21 TFLOPS2.99 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance92.03 GFLOPS373.6 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
OpenCL3.02.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.5

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.