NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
The GeForce GTX 680 has 8% better performance than the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti has 232% better value for the money than the GeForce GTX 680 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 GPU
The GeForce GTX 680 is an end-of-life desktop graphics card by NVIDIA. It launched in Q1 2012 with a suggested retail price of $499. Its GK104 chip that powers the GPU uses the Kepler architecture and is fabricated on the 28 nm process.
This GPU is paired with 2 GB of GDDR5 VRAM. Its 1,502 MHz memory clock and 256 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 192.3 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.
The GTX 680 is a dual slot graphics card, taking up 2 PCIe slots. It supports DVI, HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 display ports. This desktop card has a TDP of 195 W. NVIDIA recommends using a power supply of at least 450 W with this card. A power supply lower than this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
The GeForce GTX 680 has the 175th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 9.74% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 10,216.5 score and $499 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 20.47. This is the 83rd best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti GPU
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is an end-of-life desktop graphics card by NVIDIA. It launched in Q4 2016 with a suggested retail price of $139. Its GP107 chip that powers the GPU uses the Pascal architecture and is fabricated on the 14 nm process.
This GPU is paired with 4 GB of GDDR5 VRAM. Its 1,752 MHz memory clock and 128 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 112.1 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.
The GTX 1050 Ti is a dual slot graphics card, taking up 2 PCIe slots. It supports DVI, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.4a display ports. This desktop card has a TDP of 75 W. NVIDIA recommends using a power supply of at least 250 W with this card. A power supply lower than this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti has the 183rd highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 9.01% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 9,453 score and $139 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 68.01. This is the 47th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | GeForce GTX 680 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
| Market Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release Date | Q1 2012 | Q4 2016 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | $499 | $139 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 (2022) | GeForce GTX 680 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | -- | 31 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | -- |
| High - 1080p | -- | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | 18 FPS |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | 11 FPS |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | 7 FPS |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 5500 XT | 24 | +243% |
| GeForce GTX 1660 | 21 | +200% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | 17 | +143% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | 7 | |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 5500 XT | 7.04 | -65% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | 9.35 | -53% |
| GeForce GTX 1660 | 10.43 | -47% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | 19.86 | |
Benchmark Performance
The GeForce GTX 680 has 8% better performance than the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce GTX 680 is ranked 175th with a score of 10,216.5, and the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is ranked 183rd with a score of 9,453.
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti has 232% better value for the money than the GeForce GTX 680 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce GTX 680 is ranked 83rd with a performance per dollar of 20.47, and the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is ranked 47th with a performance per dollar of 68.01.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1650 | 13,645 | +34% |
| Radeon R9 380 | 12,191 | +19% |
| Radeon R9 280X | 10,792 | +6% |
| GeForce GTX 960 | 10,767.5 | +5% |
| GeForce GTX 680 | 10,216.5 | |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | 9,453 | -7% |
| GeForce GTX 590 | 9,166.5 | -10% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 | 8,571 | -16% |
| Radeon R7 370 | 8,518.5 | -17% |
| GeForce GTX 660 Ti | 8,415 | -18% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1050 | 78.63 | +284% |
| Radeon RX 480 | 78.25 | +282% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | 68.01 | +232% |
| Radeon R9 380 | 61.26 | +199% |
| GeForce GT 1030 | 59.84 | +192% |
| Radeon R9 Nano | 26.63 | +30% |
| GeForce GTX 780 Ti | 22.34 | +9% |
| GeForce GTX 680 | 20.47 | |
| Radeon HD 7770 (GHz Edition) | 19.48 | -5% |
| Radeon HD 7870 (GHz Edition) | 17.75 | -13% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | GeForce GTX 680 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 2,068 | 2,308.5 (+11.63%) |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 2,332 | 2,568 (+10.12%) |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 47,130 | 50,939 (+8.08%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 7,587 (+1.36%) | 7,485 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 10,000 (+5.48%) | 9,480.5 |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 78.2 | 150.4 (+92.33%) |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 5,553 | 6,317 (+13.76%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 527 | 647 (+22.77%) |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 680 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | GK104 | GP107 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Transistors | 3,540 million | 3,300 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 680 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192.3 Gb/s | 112.1 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,502 MHz | 1,752 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 256 bit | 128 bit |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 1,024 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 680 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | 2 slots | 2 slots |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 195 W | 75 W |
| Suggested PSU | 450 W | 250 W |
| Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin | -- |
| Outputs | DVI, HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 | DVI, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.4a |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 680 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| CUDA Cores | 1,536 | 768 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 8 | 6 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 128 | 48 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 32 | 32 |
| Core Clock Speed | 1,006 MHz | 1,291 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,058 MHz | 1,392 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 680 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 33.86 GPixel/s | 44.54 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 135.4 GTexel/s | 66.82 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 3.25 TFLOPS | 2.14 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 135.4 GFLOPS | 66.82 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 680 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 (5.1) | 6.7 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.