NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

VS
Performance
GeForce GTX 670M
2,6983% of 104,598
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile1,022% better
30,26229% of 104,598

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has 1,022% better performance than the GeForce GTX 670M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 670M
No data available
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 670M and the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce GTX 670M
Shop RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2012. It is built on the Fermi 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename GF114) and is manufactured on a 40 nm process.

Memory

The GTX 670M has 1,536 MB of GDDR5 memory, with a 750 MHz memory clock and a 192 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 72 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GTX 670M includes 336 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 598 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 56 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 24 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GTX 670M has the 317th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.58% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile GPU

The NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q1 2023. It is built on the Ada Lovelace GPU microarchitecture (codename AD107) and is manufactured on a 5 nm process.

Memory

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 2,000 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 256 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile includes 3,072 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,635 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,115 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 96 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 48 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 96 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 24 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 50 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has the 74th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 28.93% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce GTX 670MRTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitectureFermi 2.0Ada Lovelace
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2012Q1 2023
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite
Display FPS for Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
CS: GO

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite
GeForce GTX 670MRTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Low - 720p
151 FPS
--
Medium - 768p
88 FPS
--
High - 768p
76 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
23 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 670M orRTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 670M orRTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce GTX 670M
2,6983% of 104,598
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile1,022% better
30,26229% of 104,598

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has 1,022% better performance than the GeForce GTX 670M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce GTX 670M is ranked 317th with a score of 2,698, and the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is ranked 74th with a score of 30,262.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 670M
No data available
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 670M and the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 670M or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 670M orRTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce GTX 670MRTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
8,433
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
8,849
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
14,940
--
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1,950
22,039
(+1,030.21%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
2,989
27,558
(+821.98%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
--
295
PassMark G3D Mark
1,745
15,579
(+792.78%)
PassMark G2D Mark
301
602
(+100%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
27.6
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce GTX 670MRTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
CodenameGF114AD107
ArchitectureFermi 2.0Ada Lovelace
Process Size40 nm5 nm
Transistors1,950 million18,900 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce GTX 670MRTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Memory Size1,536 MB8 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth72 Gb/s256 Gb/s
Memory Clock750 MHz2,000 MHz
Memory Interface192 bit128 bit
L1 Cache64 KB128 KB
L2 Cache384 KB12 MB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce GTX 670MRTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Bus InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)75 W50 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce GTX 670MRTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
CUDA Cores3363,072
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)724
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)5696
Render Output Units (ROP)2448
Tensor Cores--96
Ray Tracing Cores--24
Core Clock Speed598 MHz1,635 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)--2,115 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce GTX 670MRTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Pixel Fill Rate8.37 GPixel/s101.5 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate33.49 GTexel/s203 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance803.7 GFLOPS12.99 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance66.98 GFLOPS203 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce GTX 670MRTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL1.13.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model5.16.7

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.