NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M vs AMD Radeon R9 M280X

VS
Performance
GeForce GTX 670M
2,6983% of 104,598
Radeon R9 M280X74% better
4,6984% of 104,598

The Radeon R9 M280X has 74% better performance than the GeForce GTX 670M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 670M
No data available
Radeon R9 M280X
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 670M and the Radeon R9 M280X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce GTX 670M
Shop Radeon R9 M280X
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2012. It is built on the Fermi 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename GF114) and is manufactured on a 40 nm process.

Memory

The GTX 670M has 1,536 MB of GDDR5 memory, with a 750 MHz memory clock and a 192 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 72 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GTX 670M includes 336 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 598 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 56 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 24 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GTX 670M has the 317th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.58% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon R9 M280X GPU

The AMD Radeon R9 M280X is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2015. It is built on the GCN 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Saturn) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R9 M280X has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,375 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 88 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R9 M280X includes 896 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 900 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,000 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 56 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The R9 M280X has the 256th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 4.49% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce GTX 670MRadeon R9 M280X
ManufacturerNVIDIAAMD
ArchitectureFermi 2.0GCN 2.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2012Q1 2015
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for FIFA 20
FIFA 20
Display FPS for Assassin´s Creed Origins
Assassin´s Creed Origins
Display FPS for Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
Display FPS for Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
Display FPS for Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Display FPS for Dota 2 - Reborn
Dota 2 - Reborn
Display FPS for Rocket League
Rocket League

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for FIFA 20
FIFA 20
GeForce GTX 670MRadeon R9 M280X
Low - 720p
--
66 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
--
High - 1080p
--
--
Ultra - 1080p
--
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 670M orRadeon R9 M280X
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce MX250122+85%
Radeon 540X113.5+72%
GeForce MX350104+58%
GeForce 930MX94+43%
GeForce MX23073.1+11%
Radeon R9 M280X65.9

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 670M orRadeon R9 M280X
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce GTX 670M
2,6983% of 104,598
Radeon R9 M280X74% better
4,6984% of 104,598

The Radeon R9 M280X has 74% better performance than the GeForce GTX 670M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce GTX 670M is ranked 317th with a score of 2,698, and the Radeon R9 M280X is ranked 256th with a score of 4,698.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 670M
No data available
Radeon R9 M280X
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 670M and the Radeon R9 M280X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 670M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
GeForce GTX 770M4,889+81%
GeForce MX3304,834+79%
Radeon R9 M280X4,698+74%
Radeon RX 540 Mobile4,646+72%
GeForce MX2504,633+72%
GeForce GTX 485M2,709+0%
Radeon HD 7870M2,702+0%
GeForce GTX 670M2,698
Quadro 5010M2,693-0%
Quadro M5202,658-1%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 670M orRadeon R9 M280X
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce GTX 670MRadeon R9 M280X
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
--
1,012
3DMark Time Spy Score
--
1,041
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
14,940
23,201
(+55.29%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1,950
3,498
(+79.38%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
2,989
3,823
(+27.9%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
--
50.7
PassMark G3D Mark
1,745
(+114.37%)
814
PassMark G2D Mark
301
(+21.86%)
247
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
27.6
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce GTX 670MRadeon R9 M280X
CodenameGF114Saturn
ArchitectureFermi 2.0GCN 2.0
Process Size40 nm28 nm
Transistors1,950 million2,080 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce GTX 670MRadeon R9 M280X
Memory Size1,536 MB4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth72 Gb/s88 Gb/s
Memory Clock750 MHz1,375 MHz
Memory Interface192 bit128 bit
L1 Cache64 KB16 KB
L2 Cache384 KB256 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce GTX 670MRadeon R9 M280X
Bus InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)75 W75 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce GTX 670MRadeon R9 M280X
Stream Processors (SP)--896
CUDA Cores336--
Compute Units (CU)--14
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)7--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)5656
Render Output Units (ROP)2416
Core Clock Speed598 MHz900 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)--1,000 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce GTX 670MRadeon R9 M280X
Pixel Fill Rate8.37 GPixel/s16 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate33.49 GTexel/s56 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance803.7 GFLOPS1.79 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance66.98 GFLOPS112 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce GTX 670MRadeon R9 M280X
DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
OpenCL1.12.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model5.16.5

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.