NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)

VS
Performance
GeForce GTX 660M
2,3692% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)184% better
6,7366% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition) has 184% better performance than the GeForce GTX 660M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 660M
No data available
GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 660M and the GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce GTX 660M
Shop GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2012. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK107) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GTX 660M has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,250 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 80 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GTX 660M includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 835 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 950 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 50 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GTX 660M has the 336th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.26% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition) GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition) is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q4 2012. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK104) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GTX 680MX has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,250 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 160 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GTX 680MX includes 1,536 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 719 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 719 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 128 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 122 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GTX 680MX has the 224th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 6.44% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce GTX 660MGeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitectureKeplerKepler
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2012Q4 2012
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
The Witcher 3
Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite
Display FPS for Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
CS: GO

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
The Witcher 3
GeForce GTX 660MGeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)
Low - 720p
--
72 FPS
Medium - 768p
--
44 FPS
High - 1080p
--
26 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
14 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 660M orGeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 660M orGeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce GTX 660M
2,3692% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)184% better
6,7366% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition) has 184% better performance than the GeForce GTX 660M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce GTX 660M is ranked 336th with a score of 2,369, and the GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition) is ranked 224th with a score of 6,736.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 660M
No data available
GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 660M and the GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 660M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Radeon Pro 4606,749+185%
Radeon 660M6,743+185%
GeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)6,736+184%
GeForce MX3506,166+160%
GeForce GTX 775M (Mac Edition)6,071+156%
GeForce GTX 570M2,399+1%
Quadro K2100M2,393.5+1%
GeForce GTX 660M2,369
Quadro M500M2,364.5-0%
FirePro W4190M2,351-1%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 660M orGeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce GTX 660MGeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
12,861
--
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1,751
--
3DMark 11 Performance Score
2,543
6,883
(+170.66%)
PassMark G3D Mark
1,443
4,138
(+186.76%)
PassMark G2D Mark
269
539
(+100.37%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce GTX 660MGeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)
CodenameGK107GK104
ArchitectureKeplerKepler
Process Size28 nm28 nm
Transistors1,270 million3,540 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce GTX 660MGeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)
Memory Size2 GB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth80 Gb/s160 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,250 MHz1,250 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit256 bit
L1 Cache16 KB16 KB
L2 Cache256 KB512 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce GTX 660MGeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)
Bus InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)50 W122 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce GTX 660MGeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)
CUDA Cores3841,536
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)28
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)32128
Render Output Units (ROP)1632
Core Clock Speed835 MHz719 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)950 MHz719 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce GTX 660MGeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)
Pixel Fill Rate7.6 GPixel/s23.01 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate30.4 GTexel/s92.03 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance729.6 GFLOPS2.21 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance30.4 GFLOPS92.03 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce GTX 660MGeForce GTX 680MX (Mac Edition)
DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
OpenCL3.03.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.5 (5.1)

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.