Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
8,4158% of 104,598
Radeon RX 7600M XT342% better
37,20236% of 104,598
The Radeon RX 7600M XT has 342% better performance than the GeForce GTX 660 Ti for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
28.1417% of 161.45
Radeon RX 7600M XT
No data available
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti has 17% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.
Shop GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Shop Radeon RX 7600M XT
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q3 2012 with a MSRP of $299. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK104) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The GTX 660 Ti has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,502 MHz memory clock and a 192 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 144.2 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The GTX 660 Ti includes 1,344 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 915 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 980 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 112 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 24 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GTX 660 Ti occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports DVI, HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 display connections. NVIDIA recommends a power supply of at least 450 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 150 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The GTX 660 Ti has the 197th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 8.05% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 8,415 score and $299 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 28.14. This is the 81st best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
About the AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT GPU
The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q1 2023. It is built on the RDNA 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Navi 33) and is manufactured on a 6 nm process.
Memory
The RX 7600M XT has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 2,250 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 288 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The RX 7600M XT includes 2,048 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,280 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,469 MHz. It usually operates at 2,023 MHz during typical gaming workloads. Complementing the processing units are 128 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 32 ray accelerators dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 120 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The RX 7600M XT has the 50th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 35.57% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | AMD |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 3.0 |
| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q3 2012 | Q1 2023 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | $299 | -- |
| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
Black Myth: Wukong
Once Human
The First Descendant
F1 24
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2
Ghost of Tsushima
Dragon's Dogma 2
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Black Myth: Wukong | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | -- | 87 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 62 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 47 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | 25 FPS |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | 18 FPS |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | 6 FPS |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 660 Ti orRadeon RX 7600M XT
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | 18 | +200% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | 13 | +117% |
| GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | 11 | +83% |
| GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile | 10 | +67% |
| Radeon RX 7600M XT | 6 | |
| Arc A730M | 4 | -33% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 660 Ti orRadeon RX 7600M XT
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
8,4158% of 104,598
Radeon RX 7600M XT342% better
37,20236% of 104,598
The Radeon RX 7600M XT has 342% better performance than the GeForce GTX 660 Ti for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is ranked 197th with a score of 8,415, and the Radeon RX 7600M XT is ranked 50th with a score of 37,202.
Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
28.1417% of 161.45
Radeon RX 7600M XT
No data available
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti has 43% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
GeForce GTX 660 Ti's 28.14 performance per dollar ranks it 81st among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 660 Ti or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 7700S | 37,918 | +351% |
| Arc A770M | 37,375 | +344% |
| Radeon RX 7600M XT | 37,202 | +342% |
| GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile | 36,969.5 | +339% |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | 36,185 | +330% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 | 8,571 | +2% |
| Radeon R7 370 | 8,518.5 | +1% |
| GeForce GTX 660 Ti | 8,415 | |
| GeForce GTX 950 | 8,351 | -1% |
| GeForce GTX 760 | 7,962 | -5% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 660 Ti orRadeon RX 7600M XT
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon R9 280X | 36.09 | +28% |
| GeForce GTX 980 | 32.07 | +14% |
| GeForce GTX 760 | 31.98 | +14% |
| Radeon R9 FURY | 31.95 | +14% |
| Radeon R9 290X | 29.45 | +5% |
| GeForce GTX 660 Ti | 28.14 | |
| Radeon R9 Nano | 26.63 | -5% |
| GeForce GTX 780 Ti | 22.34 | -21% |
| GeForce GTX 680 | 20.47 | -27% |
| Radeon HD 7770 (GHz Edition) | 19.48 | -31% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | -- | 9,526.5 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | -- | 9,804 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 37,758 | 152,903 (+304.96%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 5,432 | 28,271 (+420.45%) |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | -- | 106,442 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 7,693 | 29,601.5 (+284.78%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | -- | 227.5 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 4,429 | 13,018 (+193.93%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 467 | 778 (+66.6%) |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | 78.7 | -- |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | GK104 | Navi 33 |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Transistors | 3,540 million | 13,300 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 144.2 Gb/s | 288 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,502 MHz | 2,250 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 192 bit | 128 bit |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB | 2 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | 2 slots | -- |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 W | 120 W |
| Suggested PSU | 450 W | -- |
| Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin | -- |
| Outputs | DVI, HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | -- | 2,048 |
| CUDA Cores | 1,344 | -- |
| Compute Units (CU) | -- | 32 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 7 | -- |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 112 | 128 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 24 | 64 |
| Ray Accelerators | -- | 32 |
| Core Clock Speed | 915 MHz | 1,280 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 980 MHz | 2,469 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Game) | -- | 2,023 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 27.44 GPixel/s | 158 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 109.8 GTexel/s | 316 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 2.63 TFLOPS | 20.23 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 109.8 GFLOPS | 632.1 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 (5.1) | 6.8 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.