Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
8,4158% of 104,598
Radeon R9 Nano105% better
17,28217% of 104,598
The Radeon R9 Nano has 105% better performance than the GeForce GTX 660 Ti for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 660 Ti6% better
28.1417% of 161.45
Radeon R9 Nano
26.6316% of 161.45
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti has 6% better value for the money than the Radeon R9 Nano for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Shop GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Shop Radeon R9 Nano
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q3 2012 with a MSRP of $299. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK104) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The GTX 660 Ti has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,502 MHz memory clock and a 192 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 144.2 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The GTX 660 Ti includes 1,344 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 915 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 980 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 112 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 24 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GTX 660 Ti occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports DVI, HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 display connections. NVIDIA recommends a power supply of at least 450 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 150 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The GTX 660 Ti has the 197th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 8.05% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 8,415 score and $299 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 28.14. This is the 81st best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
About the AMD Radeon R9 Nano GPU
The AMD Radeon R9 Nano is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q3 2015 with a MSRP of $649. It is built on the GCN 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Fiji) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The R9 Nano has 4 GB of HBM memory, with a 500 MHz memory clock and a 4,096 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 512 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The R9 Nano includes 4,096 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,000 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 256 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The R9 Nano occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 display connections. AMD recommends a power supply of at least 450 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 175 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The R9 Nano has the 133rd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 16.52% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 17,282 score and $649 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 26.63. This is the 82nd best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | AMD |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 3.0 |
| Market Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release Date | Q3 2012 | Q3 2015 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | $299 | $649 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
Rise of the Tomb Raider
The Witcher 3
BioShock Infinite
CS: GO
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Rise of the Tomb Raider | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 768p | -- | -- |
| Medium - 768p | -- | -- |
| High - 1080p | -- | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | 56 FPS |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD | -- | 30 FPS |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 660 Ti orRadeon R9 Nano
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | 37 | +24% |
| Radeon RX 590 | 32.6 | +9% |
| Radeon R9 FURY | 32.4 | +9% |
| Radeon RX 5500 XT | 30 | +1% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | 30 | +1% |
| Radeon R9 Nano | 29.8 | |
| Radeon RX 570 | 28.5 | -4% |
| GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB) | 28 | -6% |
| GeForce GTX 980 | 27.9 | -6% |
| Radeon RX 6500 XT | 27.8 | -7% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 660 Ti orRadeon R9 Nano
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon R9 280X | 14.17 | -35% |
| GeForce GTX 980 Ti | 15.99 | -27% |
| Radeon R9 FURY | 16.94 | -22% |
| GeForce GTX 980 | 19.68 | -10% |
| Radeon R9 290X | 20.18 | -7% |
| Radeon R9 Nano | 21.78 | |
| GeForce GTX 680 | 29.01 | +33% |
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
8,4158% of 104,598
Radeon R9 Nano105% better
17,28217% of 104,598
The Radeon R9 Nano has 105% better performance than the GeForce GTX 660 Ti for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is ranked 197th with a score of 8,415, and the Radeon R9 Nano is ranked 133rd with a score of 17,282.
Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 660 Ti6% better
28.1417% of 161.45
Radeon R9 Nano
26.6316% of 161.45
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti has 6% better value for the money than the Radeon R9 Nano for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is ranked 81st with a performance per dollar of 28.14, and the Radeon R9 Nano is ranked 82nd with a performance per dollar of 26.63.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 660 Ti or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon R9 FURY | 17,543 | +108% |
| GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB) | 17,401 | +107% |
| Radeon R9 Nano | 17,282 | +105% |
| Radeon R9 290X | 16,167.5 | +92% |
| GeForce GTX 970 | 16,033 | +91% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 | 8,571 | +2% |
| Radeon R7 370 | 8,518.5 | +1% |
| GeForce GTX 660 Ti | 8,415 | |
| GeForce GTX 950 | 8,351 | -1% |
| GeForce GTX 760 | 7,962 | -5% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 660 Ti or
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 980 | 32.07 | +14% |
| GeForce GTX 760 | 31.98 | +14% |
| Radeon R9 FURY | 31.95 | +14% |
| Radeon R9 290X | 29.45 | +5% |
| GeForce GTX 660 Ti | 28.14 | |
| Radeon R9 Nano | 26.63 | -5% |
| GeForce GTX 780 Ti | 22.34 | -21% |
| GeForce GTX 680 | 20.47 | -27% |
| Radeon HD 7770 (GHz Edition) | 19.48 | -31% |
| GeForce GTX 590 | 13.11 | -53% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | -- | 4,511 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | -- | 4,556 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 37,758 | 81,374 (+115.51%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 5,432 | 14,362 (+164.4%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 7,693 | 14,793 (+92.29%) |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 4,429 | -- |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 467 | -- |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | 78.7 | -- |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | GK104 | Fiji |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | 3,540 million | 8,900 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | HBM |
| Memory Bandwidth | 144.2 Gb/s | 512 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,502 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 192 bit | 4,096 bit |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | 16 KB |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB | 2 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | 2 slots | 2 slots |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 W | 175 W |
| Suggested PSU | 450 W | 450 W |
| Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Outputs | DVI, HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 | HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | -- | 4,096 |
| CUDA Cores | 1,344 | -- |
| Compute Units (CU) | -- | 64 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 7 | -- |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 112 | 256 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 24 | 64 |
| Core Clock Speed | 915 MHz | 1,000 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 980 MHz | -- |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 27.44 GPixel/s | 64 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 109.8 GTexel/s | 256 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 2.63 TFLOPS | 8.19 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 109.8 GFLOPS | 512 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 (5.1) | 6.5 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.