NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 M375

VS
Performance
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile507% better
20,118.519% of 104,598
Radeon R9 M375
3,3143% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 507% better performance than the Radeon R9 M375 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
No data available
Radeon R9 M375
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and the Radeon R9 M375 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Shop Radeon R9 M375
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q2 2019. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU116) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.

Memory

The GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,500 MHz memory clock and a 192 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 288 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GTX 1660 Ti Mobile includes 1,536 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,455 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,590 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 96 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 48 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 80 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has the 110th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 19.23% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon R9 M375 GPU

The AMD Radeon R9 M375 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2015. It is built on the GCN 1.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Tropo) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R9 M375 has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 28.8 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R9 M375 includes 640 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,000 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,015 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 40 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Benchmark Performance

The R9 M375 has the 288th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.17% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce GTX 1660 Ti MobileRadeon R9 M375
ManufacturerNVIDIAAMD
ArchitectureTuringGCN 1.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2019Q2 2015
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Display FPS for Skull & Bones
Skull & Bones
Display FPS for Enshrouded
Enshrouded
Display FPS for Palworld
Palworld
Display FPS for Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown
Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown
Display FPS for Ready or Not
Ready or Not
Display FPS for The Finals
The Finals

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti MobileRadeon R9 M375
Low - 1080p
73 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
56 FPS
--
High - 1080p
55 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
54 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile orRadeon R9 M375

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile orRadeon R9 M375
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile507% better
20,118.519% of 104,598
Radeon R9 M375
3,3143% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 507% better performance than the Radeon R9 M375 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is ranked 110th with a score of 20,118.5, and the Radeon R9 M375 is ranked 288th with a score of 3,314.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
No data available
Radeon R9 M375
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and the Radeon R9 M375 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile or
GPUBenchmark Performance
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q22,089+10%
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile21,261.5+6%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile20,118.5
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile19,878.5-1%
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q19,778.5-2%
GeForce GTX 760M3,369-83%
GeForce MX2303,363.5-83%
Radeon R9 M3753,314-84%
GeForce 945M3,309.5-84%
Radeon R9 M2753,261-84%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile orRadeon R9 M375
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce GTX 1660 Ti MobileRadeon R9 M375
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
5,659
--
3DMark Time Spy Score
5,697
--
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
97,517
(+1,051.87%)
8,466
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
14,818
(+788.9%)
1,667
3DMark Night Raid Graphics
66,325
--
3DMark 11 Performance Score
17,351
(+430.77%)
3,269
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
120.6
(+165.05%)
45.5
PassMark G3D Mark
10,190
(+950.52%)
970
PassMark G2D Mark
487
(+196.95%)
164
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce GTX 1660 Ti MobileRadeon R9 M375
CodenameTU116Tropo
ArchitectureTuringGCN 1.0
Process Size12 nm28 nm
Transistors6,600 million1,500 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce GTX 1660 Ti MobileRadeon R9 M375
Memory Size6 GB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR6DDR3
Memory Bandwidth288 Gb/s28.8 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,500 MHz900 MHz
Memory Interface192 bit128 bit
L1 Cache64 KB16 KB
L2 Cache1,536 KB256 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce GTX 1660 Ti MobileRadeon R9 M375
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)80 W--
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce GTX 1660 Ti MobileRadeon R9 M375
Stream Processors (SP)--640
CUDA Cores1,536--
Compute Units (CU)--10
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)24--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)9640
Render Output Units (ROP)4816
Core Clock Speed1,455 MHz1,000 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,590 MHz1,015 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce GTX 1660 Ti MobileRadeon R9 M375
Pixel Fill Rate76.32 GPixel/s16.24 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate152.6 GTexel/s40.6 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance4.88 TFLOPS1,299 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance152.6 GFLOPS81.2 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce GTX 1660 Ti MobileRadeon R9 M375
DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
OpenCL3.02.1 (1.2)
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.86.5 (5.1)

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.