NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M

VS
Performance
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q913% better
17,43917% of 104,598
GeForce GT 730M
1,7222% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has 913% better performance than the GeForce GT 730M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
No data available
GeForce GT 730M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and the GeForce GT 730M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Shop GeForce GT 730M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q2 2019. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU116) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.

Memory

The GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,500 MHz memory clock and a 192 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 288 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q includes 1,536 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,140 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,335 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 96 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 48 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 60 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has the 130th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 16.67% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2014. It is built on the Kepler 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename GK208) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GT 730M has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 14.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GT 730M includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 719 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 758 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 33 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GT 730M has the 389th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.65% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-QGeForce GT 730M
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitectureTuringKepler 2.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2019Q1 2014
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Flight Simulator 2020
Flight Simulator 2020
Display FPS for Horizon Zero Dawn
Horizon Zero Dawn
Display FPS for Death Stranding
Death Stranding
Display FPS for F1 2020
F1 2020
Display FPS for Gears Tactics
Gears Tactics
Display FPS for Doom Eternal
Doom Eternal
Display FPS for Borderlands 3
Borderlands 3

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Flight Simulator 2020
Flight Simulator 2020
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-QGeForce GT 730M
Low - 720p
55 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
49 FPS
--
High - 1080p
37 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
25 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q orGeForce GT 730M

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q orGeForce GT 730M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q913% better
17,43917% of 104,598
GeForce GT 730M
1,7222% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has 913% better performance than the GeForce GT 730M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is ranked 130th with a score of 17,439, and the GeForce GT 730M is ranked 389th with a score of 1,722.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
No data available
GeForce GT 730M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and the GeForce GT 730M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q orGeForce GT 730M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-QGeForce GT 730M
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
5,084.5
--
3DMark Time Spy Score
5,072
--
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
63,086
(+782.07%)
7,152
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
13,355
(+1,158.72%)
1,061
3DMark 11 Performance Score
15,913
(+743.74%)
1,886
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
96.9
(+103.57%)
47.6
PassMark G3D Mark
8,608
(+957.49%)
814
PassMark G2D Mark
361
(+107.47%)
174
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
--
14.1
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
--
14.1
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-QGeForce GT 730M
CodenameTU116GK208
ArchitectureTuringKepler 2.0
Process Size12 nm28 nm
Transistors6,600 million1,020 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-QGeForce GT 730M
Memory Size6 GB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR6DDR3
Memory Bandwidth288 Gb/s14.4 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,500 MHz900 MHz
Memory Interface192 bit64 bit
L1 Cache64 KB16 KB
L2 Cache1,536 KB512 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-QGeForce GT 730M
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)60 W33 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-QGeForce GT 730M
CUDA Cores1,536384
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)242
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)9632
Render Output Units (ROP)488
Core Clock Speed1,140 MHz719 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,335 MHz758 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-QGeForce GT 730M
Pixel Fill Rate64.08 GPixel/s6.06 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate128.2 GTexel/s24.26 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance4.1 TFLOPS582.1 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance128.2 GFLOPS24.26 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-QGeForce GT 730M
DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
OpenCL3.03.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.86.5 (5.1)

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.