Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q101% better
17,43917% of 104,598
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
8,6568% of 104,598
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has 101% better performance than the Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
No data available
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and the Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Shop GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Shop Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q2 2019. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU116) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.
Memory
The GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,500 MHz memory clock and a 192 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 288 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q includes 1,536 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,140 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,335 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 96 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 48 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 60 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has the 130th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 16.67% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the AMD Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) GPU
The AMD Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2015. It is built on the GCN 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Amethyst) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The R9 M395 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,365 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 174.7 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The R9 M395 includes 1,792 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 834 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 112 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 250 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The R9 M395 has the 192nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 8.28% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | AMD |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q2 2019 | Q2 2015 |
| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
Flight Simulator 2020
Horizon Zero Dawn
Death Stranding
F1 2020
Gears Tactics
Doom Eternal
Borderlands 3
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Flight Simulator 2020 | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | 55 FPS | -- |
| Medium - 1080p | 49 FPS | -- |
| High - 1080p | 37 FPS | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | 25 FPS | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q orRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 31 | +23% |
| GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q | 30.9 | +22% |
| GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | 28 | +11% |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | 28 | +11% |
| GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile | 26.4 | +4% |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | 25.3 | |
| GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | 24.7 | -2% |
| GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | 23 | -9% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | 21.8 | -14% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 18 | -29% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q orRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q101% better
17,43917% of 104,598
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
8,6568% of 104,598
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has 101% better performance than the Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is ranked 130th with a score of 17,439, and the Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) is ranked 192nd with a score of 8,656.
Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
No data available
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and the Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 6500M | 17,889 | +3% |
| Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q | 17,523 | +0% |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | 17,439 | |
| GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile (6 GB) | 17,421 | -0% |
| GeForce GTX 980 Mobile | 17,200.5 | -1% |
| Radeon R9 M295X | 8,850.5 | -49% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | 8,752 | -50% |
| Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) | 8,656 | -50% |
| GeForce GTX 880M | 8,578 | -51% |
| Radeon RX 560 Mobile | 8,329 | -52% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q orRadeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 5,084.5 | -- |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 5,072 | -- |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 63,086 (+63.9%) | 38,490 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 13,355 (+95.85%) | 6,819 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 15,913 (+91.61%) | 8,305 |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 96.9 | -- |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 8,608 (+75.28%) | 4,911 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 361 | 719 (+99.17%) |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | TU116 | Amethyst |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Size | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | 6,600 million | 5,000 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 6 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 Gb/s | 174.7 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,500 MHz | 1,365 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 192 bit | 256 bit |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | -- |
| L2 Cache | 1,536 KB | -- |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 W | 250 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | -- | 1,792 |
| CUDA Cores | 1,536 | -- |
| Compute Units (CU) | -- | 28 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 24 | -- |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 96 | 112 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 48 | 32 |
| Core Clock Speed | 1,140 MHz | 834 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,335 MHz | -- |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 64.08 GPixel/s | 26.69 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 128.2 GTexel/s | 93.41 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 4.1 TFLOPS | 2.99 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 128.2 GFLOPS | 373.6 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | 6.5 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880MNVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Mobile
vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 MobileNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-QNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 MobileAMD Radeon RX 6500M
vs
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile (6 GB)
vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880MNVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Mobile
vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 MobileNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-QNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 MobileAMD Radeon RX 6500M
vs
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile (6 GB)
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.