NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (Mobile) vs AMD Radeon R9 M295X
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (Mobile) has 50% better performance than the Radeon R9 M295X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (Mobile) and the Radeon R9 M295X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (Mobile) GPU
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (Mobile) is a mobile graphics card by NVIDIA. It launched in Q2 2020. Its TU116 chip that powers the GPU uses the Turing architecture and is fabricated on the 12 nm process.
This GPU is paired with 4 GB of GDDR6 VRAM. Its 1,500 MHz memory clock and 128 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 192 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.
This mobile card has a TDP of 50 W.
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (Mobile) has the 151st highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 12.64% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the AMD Radeon R9 M295X GPU
The Radeon R9 M295X is an end-of-life mobile graphics card by AMD. It launched in Q4 2014. Its Amethyst chip that powers the GPU uses the GCN 3.0 architecture and is fabricated on the 28 nm process.
This GPU is paired with 4 GB of GDDR5 VRAM. Its 1,250 MHz memory clock and 256 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 160 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.
This mobile card has a TDP of 250 W.
The Radeon R9 M295X has the 186th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 8.43% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (Mobile) | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | AMD |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q2 2020 | Q4 2014 |
| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Sons of the Forest | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (Mobile) | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | 58 FPS | -- |
| Medium - 1080p | 38 FPS | -- |
| High - 1080p | 36 FPS | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | 34 FPS | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 5500M | 34.5 | +1% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (Mobile) | 34.1 | |
| GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) | 33.9 | -1% |
| GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile | 33.3 | -2% |
| GeForce RTX 2050 (Mobile) | 33 | -3% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 30.1 | -12% |
| GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | 28.9 | -15% |
| Arc A370M | 11.4 | -67% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (Mobile) has 50% better performance than the Radeon R9 M295X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (Mobile) is ranked 151st with a score of 13,266, and the Radeon R9 M295X is ranked 186th with a score of 8,850.5.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (Mobile) and the Radeon R9 M295X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Quadro T2000 (Mobile) | 13,523.5 | +2% |
| GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q | 13,333.5 | +1% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (Mobile) | 13,266 | |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 13,131.5 | -1% |
| GeForce GTX 980M | 12,517 | -6% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | 9,615.5 | -28% |
| Radeon R9 M390X | 9,448 | -29% |
| Radeon R9 M295X | 8,850.5 | -33% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | 8,752 | -34% |
| Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition) | 8,656 | -35% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (Mobile) | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 3,618 | -- |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3,851 | -- |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 65,163 (+70.89%) | 38,132 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 9,930 (+50.67%) | 6,590.5 |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | 44,557 | -- |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 13,072.5 (+49.75%) | 8,729.5 |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 126.7 (+16.56%) | 108.7 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 7,568 (+46.95%) | 5,150 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 384 | 824 (+114.58%) |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (Mobile) | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | TU116 | Amethyst |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Size | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | 6,600 million | 5,000 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (Mobile) | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 Gb/s | 160 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,500 MHz | 1,250 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 16 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1,024 KB | 512 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (Mobile) | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 W | 250 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (Mobile) | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | -- | 2,048 |
| CUDA Cores | 1,024 | -- |
| Compute Units (CU) | -- | 32 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 16 | -- |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 64 | 128 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 32 | 32 |
| Core Clock Speed | 1,350 MHz | 723 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,485 MHz | 850 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (Mobile) | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 47.52 GPixel/s | 23.14 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 95.04 GTexel/s | 92.54 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 3.04 TFLOPS | 2.96 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 95.04 GFLOPS | 185.1 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (Mobile) | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
vs
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 (Mobile)NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
vs
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti MobileNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
vs
AMD Radeon RX 5500MAMD Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)
vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-QNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)
vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.