NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

VS
Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q357% better
11,082.511% of 104,598
Quadro K3000M
2,4272% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q has 357% better performance than the Quadro K3000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
No data available
Quadro K3000M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and the Quadro K3000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Shop Quadro K3000M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q2 2019. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU117) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.

Memory

The GTX 1650 Max-Q has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,751 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 112.1 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GTX 1650 Max-Q includes 1,024 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,020 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,245 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 50 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GTX 1650 Max-Q has the 169th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 10.60% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA Quadro K3000M GPU

The NVIDIA Quadro K3000M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2012. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK104) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The K3000M has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 700 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 89.6 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The K3000M includes 576 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 654 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 654 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The K3000M has the 330th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.32% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoGeForce GTX 1650 Max-QQuadro K3000M
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
ArchitectureTuringKepler
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2019Q2 2012
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Borderlands 3
Borderlands 3
Display FPS for Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Display FPS for Need for Speed Heat
NFS Heat
Display FPS for Red Dead Redemption 2
Red Dead Redemption 2
Display FPS for Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019)
Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019)
Display FPS for GRID (2019)
GRID (2019)
Display FPS for Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Breakpoint
Ghost Recon Breakpoint

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Borderlands 3
Borderlands 3
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-QQuadro K3000M
Low - 720p
95 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
52 FPS
--
High - 1080p
34 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
26 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q orQuadro K3000M

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q orQuadro K3000M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q357% better
11,082.511% of 104,598
Quadro K3000M
2,4272% of 104,598

The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q has 357% better performance than the Quadro K3000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is ranked 169th with a score of 11,082.5, and the Quadro K3000M is ranked 330th with a score of 2,427.

Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
No data available
Quadro K3000M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and the Quadro K3000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Quadro T1000 Mobile11,377+3%
Radeon HD 7970M X211,119+0%
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q11,082.5
RTX A500 Mobile10,818-2%
Arc A350M10,730-3%
Radeon HD 6950M2,452-78%
Quadro K620M2,434-78%
Quadro K3000M2,427-78%
FirePro M60002,422-78%
GeForce 940M2,405.5-78%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q orQuadro K3000M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkGeForce GTX 1650 Max-QQuadro K3000M
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
3,016
--
3DMark Time Spy Score
3,070
--
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
45,243.5
--
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
7,779
--
3DMark 11 Performance Score
10,471
(+278.42%)
2,767
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
108.1
--
PassMark G3D Mark
6,177
(+277.11%)
1,638
PassMark G2D Mark
329
340
(+3.34%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecGeForce GTX 1650 Max-QQuadro K3000M
CodenameTU117GK104
ArchitectureTuringKepler
Process Size12 nm28 nm
Transistors4,700 million3,540 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecGeForce GTX 1650 Max-QQuadro K3000M
Memory Size4 GB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth112.1 Gb/s89.6 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,751 MHz700 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit256 bit
L1 Cache64 KB16 KB
L2 Cache1,024 KB512 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecGeForce GTX 1650 Max-QQuadro K3000M
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)50 W75 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecGeForce GTX 1650 Max-QQuadro K3000M
CUDA Cores1,024576
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)163
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)6448
Render Output Units (ROP)3232
Core Clock Speed1,020 MHz654 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,245 MHz654 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecGeForce GTX 1650 Max-QQuadro K3000M
Pixel Fill Rate39.84 GPixel/s7.85 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate79.68 GTexel/s31.39 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance2.55 TFLOPS753.4 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance79.68 GFLOPS31.39 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecGeForce GTX 1650 Max-QQuadro K3000M
DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
OpenCL3.03.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.86.5 (5.1)

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.