Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
11,082.511% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 780 Ti41% better
15,61915% of 104,598
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti has 41% better performance than the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
No data available
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
22.3414% of 161.45
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti has 14% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.
Shop GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Shop GeForce GTX 780 Ti
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q2 2019. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU117) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.
Memory
The GTX 1650 Max-Q has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,751 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 112.1 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The GTX 1650 Max-Q includes 1,024 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,020 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,245 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 50 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The GTX 1650 Max-Q has the 169th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 10.60% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q4 2013 with a MSRP of $699. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK110B) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The GTX 780 Ti has 3 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,753 MHz memory clock and a 384 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 336.6 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The GTX 780 Ti includes 2,880 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 875 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 928 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 240 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 48 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GTX 780 Ti occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports DVI, HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 display connections. NVIDIA recommends a power supply of at least 600 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 250 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The GTX 780 Ti has the 141st best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 14.93% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 15,619 score and $699 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 22.34. This is the 83rd best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |
| Release Date | Q2 2019 | Q4 2013 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | -- | $699 |
| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
Borderlands 3
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
NFS Heat
Red Dead Redemption 2
Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019)
GRID (2019)
Ghost Recon Breakpoint
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Borderlands 3 | GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | 95 FPS | -- |
| Medium - 1080p | 52 FPS | -- |
| High - 1080p | 34 FPS | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | 26 FPS | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q orGeForce GTX 780 Ti
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 31 | +19% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | 31 | +19% |
| Radeon Pro 5500M | 30.8 | +18% |
| Quadro T2000 Max-Q | 27.3 | +5% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | 26.1 | +0% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | 26 | |
| Arc A370M | 22 | -15% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | 20.1 | -23% |
| GeForce GTX 965M | 18.7 | -28% |
| Radeon 680M | 18 | -31% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q orGeForce GTX 780 Ti
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
11,082.511% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 780 Ti41% better
15,61915% of 104,598
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti has 41% better performance than the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is ranked 169th with a score of 11,082.5, and the GeForce GTX 780 Ti is ranked 141st with a score of 15,619.
Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
No data available
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
22.3414% of 161.45
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti has 34% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
GeForce GTX 780 Ti's 22.34 performance per dollar ranks it 0th among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon R9 290X | 16,167.5 | +46% |
| GeForce GTX 970 | 16,033 | +45% |
| GeForce GTX 780 Ti | 15,619 | +41% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | 13,645 | +23% |
| Radeon R9 380 | 12,191 | +10% |
| Quadro T1000 Mobile | 11,377 | +3% |
| Radeon HD 7970M X2 | 11,119 | +0% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | 11,082.5 | |
| RTX A500 Mobile | 10,818 | -2% |
| Arc A350M | 10,730 | -3% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q orGeForce GTX 780 Ti
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 760 | 31.98 | +43% |
| Radeon R9 FURY | 31.95 | +43% |
| Radeon R9 290X | 29.45 | +32% |
| GeForce GTX 660 Ti | 28.14 | +26% |
| Radeon R9 Nano | 26.63 | +19% |
| GeForce GTX 780 Ti | 22.34 | |
| GeForce GTX 680 | 20.47 | -8% |
| Radeon HD 7870 (GHz Edition) | 17.75 | -21% |
| Radeon HD 7970 | 14.15 | -37% |
| GeForce GTX 590 | 13.11 | -41% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 3,016 | -- |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3,070 | -- |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 45,243.5 | 75,688 (+67.29%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 7,779 | 11,812 (+51.84%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 10,471 | 13,151 (+25.59%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 108.1 | -- |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 6,177 | 9,525 (+54.2%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 329 | 640 (+94.53%) |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | -- | 143.4 |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | TU117 | GK110B |
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
| Process Size | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | 4,700 million | 7,080 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112.1 Gb/s | 336.6 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,751 MHz | 1,753 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 128 bit | 384 bit |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 16 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1,024 KB | 1,536 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | -- | 2 slots |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 W | 250 W |
| Suggested PSU | -- | 600 W |
| Power Connectors | -- | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | DVI, HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| CUDA Cores | 1,024 | 2,880 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 16 | 15 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 64 | 240 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 32 | 48 |
| Core Clock Speed | 1,020 MHz | 875 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,245 MHz | 928 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 39.84 GPixel/s | 55.68 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 79.68 GTexel/s | 222.7 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 2.55 TFLOPS | 5.35 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 79.68 GFLOPS | 222.7 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | 6.5 (5.1) |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.