NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000
The RTX A2000 has 45% better performance than the GeForce GTX 1650 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce GTX 1650 has 108% better value for the money than the RTX A2000 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 is a desktop graphics card that launched in Q2 2019 with a MSRP of $149. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU117) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.
Memory
The GTX 1650 has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 2,001 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 128.1 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The GTX 1650 includes 896 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,485 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,665 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 56 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GTX 1650 occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports DVI, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.4a display connections. NVIDIA recommends a power supply of at least 250 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The GTX 1650 has the 169th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 567 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 10.60% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090. Its 13,759 score and $149 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 92.34. This is the 34th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
About the NVIDIA RTX A2000 GPU
The NVIDIA RTX A2000 is a workstation graphics card that launched in Q3 2021 with a MSRP of $449. It is built on the Ampere GPU microarchitecture (codename GA106) and is manufactured on a 8 nm process.
Memory
The RTX A2000 has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,500 MHz memory clock and a 192 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 288 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The RTX A2000 includes 3,328 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 562 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,200 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 104 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 48 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 104 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 26 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The RTX A2000 occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports mini-DisplayPort 1.4a display connections. NVIDIA recommends a power supply of at least 250 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 70 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The RTX A2000 has the 129th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 567 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 15.39% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090. Its 19,978 score and $449 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 44.49. This is the 79th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Market Segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release Date | Q2 2019 | Q3 2021 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | $149 | $449 |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
God of War Ragnarök | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | 6 FPS | -- |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | -- |
| High - 1080p | -- | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | 55.5 | +874% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | 5.7 | |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | 2.86 | -89% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | 26.14 | |
Benchmark Performance
The RTX A2000 has 45% better performance than the GeForce GTX 1650 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce GTX 1650 is ranked 169th with a score of 13,759, and the RTX A2000 is ranked 129th with a score of 19,978.
The GeForce GTX 1650 has 108% better value for the money than the RTX A2000 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce GTX 1650 is ranked 34th with a performance per dollar of 92.34, and the RTX A2000 is ranked 79th with a performance per dollar of 44.49.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon PRO W6800 | 44,404 | +223% |
| Quadro P5000 | 20,096 | +46% |
| RTX A2000 | 19,978 | +45% |
| RTX A2000 (12 GB) | 19,978 | +45% |
| GeForce GTX 780 Ti | 15,619 | +14% |
| Quadro P4000 | 15,433 | +12% |
| Arc A380 | 13,892 | +1% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | 13,759 | |
| Radeon R9 380 | 12,191 | -11% |
| Radeon R9 280X | 10,792 | -22% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1660 | 96.18 | +4% |
| Arc A380 | 93.23 | +1% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | 92.34 | |
| Radeon RX 590 | 83.74 | -9% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 | 78.63 | -15% |
| RTX A2000 | 44.49 | -52% |
| RTX A2000 (12 GB) | 44.49 | -52% |
| Radeon Pro WX 3200 | 21.8 | -76% |
| Radeon PRO W6800 | 19.74 | -79% |
| Quadro P4000 | 18.94 | -79% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 3,525 | 5,675 (+60.99%) |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3,903 | 6,282 (+60.95%) |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 54,198 | 94,407 (+74.19%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 9,460.5 | 14,934 (+57.86%) |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | 44,728 | 68,223 (+52.53%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 14,069 | 20,964 (+49.01%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 174.5 | 371.8 (+113.07%) |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 7,886 | 13,552 (+71.85%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 565 | 976 (+72.74%) |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | TU117 | GA106 |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Size | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Transistors | 4,700 million | 12,000 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128.1 Gb/s | 288 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 2,001 MHz | 1,500 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 128 bit | 192 bit |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1,024 KB | 3 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | 2 slots | 2 slots |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 W | 70 W |
| Suggested PSU | 250 W | 250 W |
| Outputs | DVI, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.4a | mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| CUDA Cores | 896 | 3,328 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 14 | 26 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 56 | 104 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 32 | 48 |
| Tensor Cores | -- | 104 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | -- | 26 |
| Core Clock Speed | 1,485 MHz | 562 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,665 MHz | 1,200 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 53.28 GPixel/s | 57.6 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 93.24 GTexel/s | 124.8 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 2.98 TFLOPS | 7.99 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 93.24 GFLOPS | 124.8 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | 6.8 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.