NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon RX 570
The Radeon RX 570 has 39% better performance than the GeForce GTX 1650 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon RX 570 has 23% better value for the money than the GeForce GTX 1650 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GPU
The GeForce GTX 1650 is a desktop graphics card by NVIDIA. It launched in Q2 2019 with a suggested retail price of $149. Its TU117 chip that powers the GPU uses the Turing architecture and is fabricated on the 12 nm process.
This GPU is paired with 4 GB of GDDR5 VRAM. Its 2,001 MHz memory clock and 128 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 128.1 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.
The GTX 1650 is a dual slot graphics card, taking up 2 PCIe slots. It supports DVI, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.4a display ports. This desktop card has a TDP of 75 W. NVIDIA recommends using a power supply of at least 250 W with this card. A power supply lower than this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
The GeForce GTX 1650 has the 148th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 13.00% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 13,645 score and $149 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 91.58. This is the 23rd best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
About the AMD Radeon RX 570 GPU
The Radeon RX 570 is a desktop graphics card by AMD. It launched in Q2 2017 with a suggested retail price of $169. Its Polaris 20 chip that powers the GPU uses the GCN 4.0 architecture and is fabricated on the 14 nm process.
This GPU is paired with 4 GB of GDDR5 VRAM. Its 1,750 MHz memory clock and 256 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 224 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.
The RX 570 is a dual slot graphics card, taking up 2 PCIe slots. It supports DVI, HDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 1.4a display ports. This desktop card has a TDP of 150 W. AMD recommends using a power supply of at least 450 W with this card. A power supply lower than this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
The Radeon RX 570 has the 115th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 18.07% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 18,967 score and $169 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 112.23. This is the 12th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | AMD |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Market Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release Date | Q2 2019 | Q2 2017 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | $149 | $169 |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Riders Republic | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | 120 FPS | -- |
| Medium - 1080p | 60 FPS | -- |
| High - 1080p | 46 FPS | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | 41 FPS | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | 27 FPS | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | 45 | +67% |
| Radeon RX 5500 XT | 43 | +59% |
| GeForce GTX 1660 | 40 | +48% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | 34 | +26% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | 27 | |
| Radeon RX 6500 XT | 27 | +0% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 5500 XT | 3.93 | -29% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | 4.68 | -15% |
| GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | 5.09 | -8% |
| GeForce GTX 1660 | 5.48 | -1% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | 5.52 | |
| Radeon RX 6500 XT | 7.37 | +34% |
Benchmark Performance
The Radeon RX 570 has 39% better performance than the GeForce GTX 1650 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce GTX 1650 is ranked 148th with a score of 13,645, and the Radeon RX 570 is ranked 115th with a score of 18,967.
The Radeon RX 570 has 23% better value for the money than the GeForce GTX 1650 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce GTX 1650 is ranked 23rd with a performance per dollar of 91.58, and the Radeon RX 570 is ranked 12th with a performance per dollar of 112.23.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1660 | 21,131 | +55% |
| Radeon RX 5500 XT | 19,499 | +43% |
| Radeon RX 570 | 18,967 | +39% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | 18,218 | +34% |
| Radeon R9 390X | 17,944 | +32% |
| GeForce GTX 970 | 16,033 | +18% |
| GeForce GTX 780 Ti | 15,619 | +14% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | 13,645 | |
| Radeon R9 380 | 12,191 | -11% |
| Radeon R9 280X | 10,792 | -21% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 5500 XT | 115.38 | +26% |
| Radeon RX 6500 XT | 115.35 | +26% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | 114.58 | +25% |
| Radeon RX 570 | 112.23 | +23% |
| Radeon RX 470 | 98.46 | +8% |
| GeForce GTX 1660 | 96.49 | +5% |
| GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | 95.99 | +5% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | 91.58 | |
| Radeon RX 590 | 83.74 | -9% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 | 78.63 | -14% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 3,512 | 3,958 (+12.7%) |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3,879 | 4,310 (+11.11%) |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 50,549 | 71,096 (+40.65%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 9,203 | 13,827 (+50.24%) |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | 44,051.5 | -- |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 13,894 | 17,450 (+25.59%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 174.5 | -- |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 7,881 | 8,015 (+1.7%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 576 | 732 (+27.08%) |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | TU117 | Polaris 20 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Size | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Transistors | 4,700 million | 5,700 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128.1 Gb/s | 224 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 2,001 MHz | 1,750 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 16 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1,024 KB | 2 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | 2 slots | 2 slots |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 W | 150 W |
| Suggested PSU | 250 W | 450 W |
| Power Connectors | -- | 1x 6-pin |
| Outputs | DVI, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.4a | DVI, HDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 1.4a |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | -- | 2,048 |
| CUDA Cores | 896 | -- |
| Compute Units (CU) | -- | 32 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 14 | -- |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 56 | 128 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 32 | 32 |
| Core Clock Speed | 1,485 MHz | 1,168 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,665 MHz | 1,244 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 53.28 GPixel/s | 39.81 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 93.24 GTexel/s | 159.2 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 2.98 TFLOPS | 5.1 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 93.24 GFLOPS | 318.5 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.