Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti1,995% better
37,671.536% of 104,598
Quadro K2000M
1,7982% of 104,598
The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti has 1,995% better performance than the Quadro K2000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
53.8933% of 161.45
Quadro K2000M
No data available
The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti has 33% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.
Shop GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Shop Quadro K2000M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q1 2017 with a MSRP of $699. It is built on the Pascal GPU microarchitecture (codename GP102) and is manufactured on a 16 nm process.
Memory
The GTX 1080 Ti has 11 GB of GDDR5X memory, with a 1,376 MHz memory clock and a 352 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 484.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The GTX 1080 Ti includes 3,584 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,481 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,582 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 224 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 88 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GTX 1080 Ti occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.4a display connections. NVIDIA recommends a power supply of at least 600 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 250 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The GTX 1080 Ti has the 47th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 36.02% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 37,671.5 score and $699 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 53.89. This is the 62nd best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
About the NVIDIA Quadro K2000M GPU
The NVIDIA Quadro K2000M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2012. It is built on the Kepler GPU microarchitecture (codename GK107) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The K2000M has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 28.8 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The K2000M includes 384 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 745 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 745 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 55 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The K2000M has the 376th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.72% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | Quadro K2000M |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q1 2017 | Q2 2012 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | $699 | -- |
| Production Status | End-of-life | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 (2022)
Cyberpunk 2077 (1.0)
Flight Simulator 2020
F1 2020
Gears Tactics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | Quadro K2000M |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | -- | -- |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | -- |
| High - 1080p | -- | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | 60 FPS | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | 37 FPS | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | 16 FPS | -- |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 1080 Ti orQuadro K2000M
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Arc A750 | 27.6 | +69% |
| GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | 24.6 | +51% |
| GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER | 24.3 | +49% |
| GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | 19.3 | +18% |
| GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | 16.3 | |
| Radeon RX 6600 XT | 15.7 | -4% |
| Radeon RX 5700 XT | 15.6 | -4% |
| Radeon RX 5700 | 13.7 | -16% |
| Radeon RX 6600 | 13.6 | -17% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 1080 Ti orQuadro K2000M
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 5700 | 25.47 | -41% |
| Radeon RX 5700 XT | 25.58 | -40% |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | 27.82 | -35% |
| GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER | 28.77 | -33% |
| GeForce RTX 3090 | 31.89 | -26% |
| GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | 42.88 | |
| GeForce GTX 1080 | 54.45 | +27% |
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti1,995% better
37,671.536% of 104,598
Quadro K2000M
1,7982% of 104,598
The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti has 1,995% better performance than the Quadro K2000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is ranked 47th with a score of 37,671.5, and the Quadro K2000M is ranked 376th with a score of 1,798.
Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
53.8933% of 161.45
Quadro K2000M
No data available
The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti has 82% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti's 53.89 performance per dollar ranks it 62nd among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 1080 Ti or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 37,941 | +1% |
| Radeon VII | 37,881 | +1% |
| GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | 37,671.5 | |
| Arc A750 | 37,288 | -1% |
| TITAN X (Pascal) | 35,995 | -4% |
| Quadro K1100M | 1,826.5 | -95% |
| GeForce GTX 560M | 1,820 | -95% |
| Quadro K2000M | 1,798 | -95% |
| Radeon R5 M335 | 1,784 | -95% |
| Radeon R5 M255 | 1,784 | -95% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 1080 Ti orQuadro K2000M
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX Vega 64 | 61.77 | +15% |
| Radeon RX 6900 XT | 59.18 | +10% |
| GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER | 58.6 | +9% |
| GeForce RTX 2080 | 57.62 | +7% |
| Radeon VII | 54.19 | +1% |
| GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | 53.89 | |
| GeForce GTX 1080 | 48.85 | -9% |
| GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 47.21 | -12% |
| GeForce RTX 3090 | 41.04 | -24% |
| TITAN X (Pascal) | 30.02 | -44% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | Quadro K2000M |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 9,401 | -- |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 8,684.5 | -- |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 142,490 (+1,525.48%) | 8,766 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 27,564 (+2,535.18%) | 1,046 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 24,935 (+1,149.87%) | 1,995 |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 160 | -- |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 18,559 (+1,733.89%) | 1,012 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 943 (+262.69%) | 260 |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | -- | 17 |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL | -- | 17.1 |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | Quadro K2000M |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | GP102 | GK107 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Process Size | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | 11,800 million | 1,270 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | Quadro K2000M |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 11 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | DDR3 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 484.4 Gb/s | 28.8 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,376 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 352 bit | 128 bit |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB | 16 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2.75 MB | 256 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | Quadro K2000M |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | 2 slots | -- |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 W | 55 W |
| Suggested PSU | 600 W | -- |
| Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | -- |
| Outputs | HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.4a | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | Quadro K2000M |
|---|---|---|
| CUDA Cores | 3,584 | 384 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 28 | 2 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 224 | 32 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 88 | 16 |
| Core Clock Speed | 1,481 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,582 MHz | 745 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | Quadro K2000M |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 139.2 GPixel/s | 5.96 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 354.4 GTexel/s | 23.84 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 11.34 TFLOPS | 572.2 GFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 354.4 GFLOPS | 23.84 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | Quadro K2000M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | 6.5 (5.1) |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.