Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
GeForce GTX 1070347% better
24,65224% of 104,598
Radeon R9 M385X
5,514.55% of 104,598
The GeForce GTX 1070 has 347% better performance than the Radeon R9 M385X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 1070
65.0440% of 161.45
Radeon R9 M385X
No data available
The GeForce GTX 1070 has 40% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.
Shop GeForce GTX 1070
Shop Radeon R9 M385X
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q2 2016 with a MSRP of $379. It is built on the Pascal GPU microarchitecture (codename GP104) and is manufactured on a 16 nm process.
Memory
The GTX 1070 has 8 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 2,002 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 256.3 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The GTX 1070 includes 1,920 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,506 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,683 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 120 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GTX 1070 occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports DVI, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.4a display connections. NVIDIA recommends a power supply of at least 450 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 150 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The GTX 1070 has the 95th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 23.57% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 24,652 score and $379 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 65.04. This is the 50th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
About the AMD Radeon R9 M385X GPU
The AMD Radeon R9 M385X is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2015. It is built on the GCN 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Strato) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The R9 M385X has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,200 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 76.8 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The R9 M385X includes 896 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,000 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,100 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 56 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The R9 M385X has the 234th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 5.27% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | GeForce GTX 1070 | Radeon R9 M385X |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | AMD |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q2 2016 | Q2 2015 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | $379 | -- |
| Production Status | End-of-life | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
Borderlands 3
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
NFS Heat
Red Dead Redemption 2
Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019)
GRID (2019)
Ghost Recon Breakpoint
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Borderlands 3 | GeForce GTX 1070 | Radeon R9 M385X |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | 141 FPS | -- |
| Medium - 1080p | 106 FPS | -- |
| High - 1080p | 75 FPS | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | 58 FPS | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | 40 FPS | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | 21 FPS | -- |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 1070 orRadeon R9 M385X
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1080 | 26.5 | +24% |
| Radeon RX 5700 | 26 | +21% |
| Radeon RX 5600 XT | 25 | +17% |
| Radeon RX 6600 | 24 | +12% |
| Radeon RX Vega 64 | 23.4 | +9% |
| GeForce GTX 1070 | 21.4 | |
| GeForce GTX 980 Ti | 20.2 | -6% |
| GeForce RTX 2060 | 19.5 | -9% |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | 17.5 | -18% |
| Radeon RX 5500 XT | 17 | -21% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 1070 orRadeon R9 M385X
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | 15.27 | -14% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | 15.9 | -10% |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | 15.94 | -10% |
| GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | 16.1 | -9% |
| Radeon RX 590 | 17.33 | -2% |
| GeForce GTX 1070 | 17.71 | |
| GeForce RTX 2070 | 17.82 | +1% |
| GeForce RTX 2060 | 17.9 | +1% |
| GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER | 19.47 | +10% |
| GeForce RTX 2080 | 19.75 | +11% |
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
GeForce GTX 1070347% better
24,65224% of 104,598
Radeon R9 M385X
5,514.55% of 104,598
The GeForce GTX 1070 has 347% better performance than the Radeon R9 M385X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce GTX 1070 is ranked 95th with a score of 24,652, and the Radeon R9 M385X is ranked 234th with a score of 5,514.5.
Performance per dollar
GeForce GTX 1070
65.0440% of 161.45
Radeon R9 M385X
No data available
The GeForce GTX 1070 has 99% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
GeForce GTX 1070's 65.04 performance per dollar ranks it 50th among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 1070 or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | 27,503 | +12% |
| GeForce RTX 2060 | 27,162.5 | +10% |
| GeForce GTX 1070 | 24,652 | |
| Radeon RX 590 | 23,362.5 | -5% |
| GeForce GTX 980 Ti | 23,057 | -6% |
| Radeon HD 7970M | 5,645 | -77% |
| Radeon HD 6970M X2 | 5,541.5 | -78% |
| Radeon R9 M385X | 5,514.5 | -78% |
| Radeon Pro 455 | 5,388 | -78% |
| FirePro M6100 | 5,369 | -78% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:GeForce GTX 1070 orRadeon R9 M385X
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 2060 | 77.83 | +20% |
| GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | 74.36 | +14% |
| Radeon RX Vega 56 | 72.9 | +12% |
| GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | 70.07 | +8% |
| GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | 68.93 | +6% |
| GeForce GTX 1070 | 65.04 | |
| GeForce RTX 2070 | 62.65 | -4% |
| Radeon RX Vega 64 | 61.77 | -5% |
| GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER | 58.6 | -10% |
| GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB) | 58.2 | -11% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | GeForce GTX 1070 | Radeon R9 M385X |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 5,896 | -- |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 5,679 | -- |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 106,934 (+374.33%) | 22,544 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 18,255 (+436.2%) | 3,404.5 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 19,449 (+336.42%) | 4,456.5 |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 136 (+203.57%) | 44.8 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 13,500 (+577.03%) | 1,994 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 860 (+222.1%) | 267 |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1070 | Radeon R9 M385X |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | GP104 | Strato |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Size | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | 7,200 million | 2,080 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1070 | Radeon R9 M385X |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256.3 Gb/s | 76.8 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 2,002 MHz | 1,200 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 256 bit | 128 bit |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB | 16 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 256 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1070 | Radeon R9 M385X |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | 2 slots | -- |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 W | 75 W |
| Suggested PSU | 450 W | -- |
| Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin | -- |
| Outputs | DVI, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.4a | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1070 | Radeon R9 M385X |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | -- | 896 |
| CUDA Cores | 1,920 | -- |
| Compute Units (CU) | -- | 14 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | 15 | -- |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 120 | 56 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 64 | 16 |
| Core Clock Speed | 1,506 MHz | 1,000 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,683 MHz | 1,100 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1070 | Radeon R9 M385X |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 107.7 GPixel/s | 17.6 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 202 GTexel/s | 61.6 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 6.46 TFLOPS | 1.97 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 202 GFLOPS | 123.2 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1070 | Radeon R9 M385X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | 6.5 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.